Balsam Paweł, Lodziński Piotr, Gawałko Monika, Kraj Leszek, Śliwczyński Andrzej, Maciejewski Cezary, Krzowski Bartosz, Tymińska Agata, Ozierański Krzysztof, Grabowski Marcin, Bednarski Janusz, Opolski Grzegorz
1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Oncology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 19;10(8):1780. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081780.
We aimed to compare long-term outcomes in Polish patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) according to oral anticoagulation (OAC) type and to evaluate the predictive value of common thromboembolic and bleeding risk scores.
Data from the CRAFT trial (NCT02987062) were included. The primary study endpoint was major adverse event (MAE; all-cause death, thromboembolic and hemorrhagic event) during the mean four-year follow-up period.
Out of 2983 patients with available follow-up data, 1686 (56%) were prescribed with vitamin K antagonist (VKA), 891 (30%) with rivaroxaban and 406 (14%) with dabigatran. Predominance of elderly and female patients with previous history of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events was observed within rivaroxaban (vs. other OAC) group. Higher rate of MAEs and its components was observed in patients on VKA followed by rivaroxaban as compared to patients on dabigatran (43% vs. 42% vs. 31%, < 0.01). After group matching based on clinical characteristics, higher risk of hemorrhagic events in VKA (vs. dabigatran) and rivaroxaban (vs. dabigatran) group were observed. The available thromboembolic (CHADS-VASs, ATRIA, RCHADS) and bleeding (HAS-BLED, ATRIA, ORBIT) risk scores showed poor prediction value.
Despite no difference in the thromboembolic event rate, treatment with VKA and rivaroxaban was associated with a significant increase in the risk of hemorrhagic events.
我们旨在根据口服抗凝药(OAC)类型比较波兰心房颤动(AF)患者的长期预后,并评估常见血栓栓塞和出血风险评分的预测价值。
纳入CRAFT试验(NCT02987062)的数据。主要研究终点是平均四年随访期内的主要不良事件(MAE;全因死亡、血栓栓塞和出血事件)。
在2983例有可用随访数据的患者中,1686例(56%)被处方使用维生素K拮抗剂(VKA),891例(30%)使用利伐沙班,406例(14%)使用达比加群。在利伐沙班(与其他OAC相比)组中观察到老年患者以及有血栓栓塞和出血事件既往史的女性患者占比更高。与使用达比加群的患者相比,使用VKA的患者随后是使用利伐沙班的患者中,MAE及其组成部分的发生率更高(43%对42%对31%,<0.01)。根据临床特征进行组匹配后,观察到VKA(与达比加群相比)和利伐沙班(与达比加群相比)组出血事件风险更高。可用的血栓栓塞(CHADS-VASs、ATRIA、RCHADS)和出血(HAS-BLED、ATRIA、ORBIT)风险评分显示预测价值较差。
尽管血栓栓塞事件发生率无差异,但VKA和利伐沙班治疗与出血事件风险显著增加相关。