Suppr超能文献

家庭物理治疗师协助囊性纤维化的随访治疗:一项多中心观察性研究。

Home physiotherapists assisting follow-up treatment in cystic fibrosis: a multicenter observational study.

机构信息

Cystic Fibrosis Centre and U.O.C. Direzione delle Professioni Sanitarie, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan .

Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Laboratory of Medical Statistics, Epidemiology and Biometry G. A. Maccacaro, University of Milan.

出版信息

Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2021 Apr 15;91(2). doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2021.1619.

Abstract

Inhaled therapies are relatively simple and easy to be managed however ineffective use of aerosols when self-administered may occur. We described variation of the number of clinic visits, lung function and number of antibiotic courses performed over 12 months in participants with cystic fibrosis (CF), when supervised or not by physiotherapists (PTs) at home. Participants in 8 Italian CF centers with a prescription of dry-powder antibiotic choose whether to be supervised at home (PT-FU) or not (non-PT-FU), in adjunct to routine clinic visits. PTs assisted participants with their inhaled therapies regimen and reviewed the airway clearance program in use.  Mixed-effect regression models were fitted to evaluate the variation of selected endpoints over time. A total of 163 participants were included.  Lung function declined over time in both groups, at higher extent in the non-PT-FU group at 6 months (-1.8, 95%CI: -4.4 to 0.7 % predicted), without reaching statistical significance, whereas in the PT-FU group only, nearly one visit less was recorded (p=0.027). Regardless the type of supervision adopted, the number of antibiotic courses did not change compared to the previous year. We counted 19/90 (21.1%) drop-out in the PT-FU, double compared to the group followed up at the clinics (p=0.065). Participants under a course of an inhaled antibiotic therapy showed a 1-year decline in lung function, whereas only the group receiving home supervision counted nearly one visit less at the CF center, whose clinical relevance should be further discussed.

摘要

吸入疗法相对简单且易于管理,但自行使用气雾剂可能无效。我们描述了在意大利 8 个囊性纤维化 (CF) 中心,根据处方使用干粉抗生素的患者,在接受或不接受家庭物理治疗师 (PT) 监督的情况下,12 个月内就诊次数、肺功能和抗生素疗程数的变化。选择在家接受监督 (PT-FU) 或不接受监督 (非-PT-FU) 的患者,同时常规就诊。PT 协助患者进行吸入疗法,并审查使用中的气道清除计划。采用混合效应回归模型评估随时间变化的选定终点的变化。共纳入 163 名患者。两组的肺功能随时间下降,非 PT-FU 组在 6 个月时下降更为明显(-1.8,95%CI:-4.4 至 0.7%预计值),但无统计学意义,而仅在 PT-FU 组中,记录的就诊次数减少了近一次(p=0.027)。无论采用何种监督方式,抗生素疗程数与前一年相比没有变化。PT-FU 组有 19/90(21.1%)脱落,是在诊所接受随访的患者的两倍(p=0.065)。接受吸入抗生素治疗的患者肺功能在 1 年内下降,而仅接受家庭监督的患者在 CF 中心就诊次数减少了近一次,其临床相关性尚需进一步讨论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验