Suppr超能文献

脾曲癌急诊手术:SFC研究组数据库结果

Emergency surgery for splenic flexure cancer: results of the SFC Study Group database.

作者信息

de'Angelis Nicola, Espin Eloy, Ris Frederic, Landi Filippo, Le Roy Bertrand, Coccolini Federico, Celentano Valerio, Gurrado Angela, Pezet Denis, Bianchi Giorgio, Memeo Riccardo, Vitali Giulio C, Solis Alejandro, Denet Christine, Di Saverio Salomone, de'Angelis Gian Luigi, Kraft Miquel, Gonzálvez-Guardiola Paula, Stakelum Aine, Catena Fausto, Fuks David, Winter Des C, Testini Mario, Martínez-Pérez Aleix

机构信息

Unit of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Digestive Surgery, General Regional Hospital F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy.

University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France.

出版信息

World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Apr 29;16(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00365-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of surgical treatment for splenic flexure carcinomas (SFCs) in emergency settings remains unexplored. This study aims to compare the perioperative and long-term outcomes of different alternatives for emergency SFC resection.

METHOD

This multicenter retrospective study was based on the SFC Study Group database. For the present analysis, SFC patients were selected if they had received emergency surgical resection with curative intent between 2000 and 2018. Extended right colectomy (ERC), left colectomy (LC), and segmental left colectomy (SLC) were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

The study sample was composed of 90 SFC patients who underwent emergency ERC (n = 55, 61.1%), LC (n = 18, 20%), or SLC (n = 17, 18.9%). Bowel obstruction was the most frequent indication for surgery (n = 75, 83.3%), and an open approach was chosen in 81.1% of the patients. A higher incidence of postoperative complications was observed in the ERC group (70.9%) than in the LC (44.4%) and SLC groups (47.1%), with a significant procedure-related difference for severe postoperative complications (Dindo-Clavien ≥ III; adjusted odds ratio for ERC vs. LC:7.23; 95% CI 1.51-34.66; p = 0.013). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 8 (11.2%) patients, with no differences between the groups (p = 0.902). R0 resection was achieved in 98.9% of the procedures, and ≥ 12 lymph nodes were retrieved in 92.2% of patients. Overall and disease-free survival rates at 5 years were similar between the groups and were significantly associated with stage pT4 and the presence of synchronous metastases.

CONCLUSION

In the emergency setting, ERC and open surgery are the most frequently performed procedures. ERC is associated with increased odds of severe postoperative complications when compared to more conservative SFC resections. Nonetheless, all the alternatives seem to provide similar pathologic and long-term outcomes, supporting the oncological safety of more conservative resections for emergency SFCs.

摘要

背景

在急诊情况下,脾曲癌(SFC)手术治疗的有效性仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在比较急诊SFC切除不同术式的围手术期及长期预后。

方法

本多中心回顾性研究基于SFC研究组数据库。本次分析纳入2000年至2018年间接受了根治性急诊手术切除的SFC患者。对扩大右半结肠切除术(ERC)、左半结肠切除术(LC)和节段性左半结肠切除术(SLC)进行评估和比较。

结果

研究样本包括90例接受急诊ERC(n = 55,61.1%)、LC(n = 18,20%)或SLC(n = 17,18.9%)的SFC患者。肠梗阻是最常见的手术指征(n = 75,83.3%),81.1%的患者选择了开放手术方式。ERC组术后并发症发生率(70.9%)高于LC组(44.4%)和SLC组(47.1%),严重术后并发症(Dindo-Clavien≥III级)存在显著的手术方式相关差异(ERC与LC相比,调整后的优势比:7.23;95%可信区间1.51 - 34.66;p = 0.013)。8例(11.2%)患者发生吻合口漏,各组间无差异(p = 0.902)。98.9%的手术实现了R0切除,92.2%的患者获取了≥12枚淋巴结。各组间5年总生存率和无病生存率相似,且与pT4分期和同时性转移的存在显著相关。

结论

在急诊情况下,ERC和开放手术是最常施行的术式。与更保守的SFC切除术相比,ERC术后严重并发症的发生几率增加。尽管如此,所有术式似乎都能提供相似的病理及长期预后,支持了急诊SFC更保守切除术的肿瘤学安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0991/8086132/160d6ab8a9fb/13017_2021_365_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验