Suppr超能文献

地西泮在 C57BL/6J 小鼠中引起镇静作用而非抗焦虑作用。

Diazepam causes sedative rather than anxiolytic effects in C57BL/6J mice.

机构信息

Behavioral Neurophysiology, Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, 75124, Uppsala, Sweden.

Brain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, 59056, Brazil.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 29;11(1):9335. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88599-5.

Abstract

Diazepam has been broadly accepted as an anxiolytic drug and is often used as a positive control in behavioral experiments with mice. However, as opposed to this general assumption, the effect of diazepam on mouse behavior can be considered rather controversial from an evidence point of view. Here we revisit this issue by studying the effect of diazepam on a benchmark task in the preclinical anxiety literature: the elevated plus maze. We evaluated the minute-by-minute time-course of the diazepam effect along the 10 min of the task at three different doses (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg i.p. 30 min before the task) in female and male C57BL/6J mice. Furthermore, we contrasted the effects of diazepam with those of a selective serotoninergic reuptake inhibitor (paroxetine, 10 mg/kg i.p. 1 h before the task). Diazepam had no anxiolytic effect at any of the tested doses, and, at the highest dose, it impaired locomotor activity, likely due to sedation. Noteworthy, our results held true when examining male and female mice separately, when only examining the first 5 min of the task, and when animals were subjected to one hour of restrain-induced stress prior to diazepam treatment. In contrast, paroxetine significantly reduced anxiety-like behavior without inducing sedative effects. Our results therefore suggest that preclinical studies for screening new anxiolytic drugs should be cautious with diazepam use as a potential positive control.

摘要

地西泮被广泛接受为抗焦虑药物,并且经常被用作小鼠行为实验的阳性对照。然而,与这种普遍假设相反,从证据的角度来看,地西泮对小鼠行为的影响可以说是相当有争议的。在这里,我们通过研究地西泮对临床前焦虑文献中的基准任务(高架十字迷宫)的影响来重新审视这个问题。我们评估了在三种不同剂量(0.5、1 和 2mg/kg 腹腔注射,任务前 30 分钟)下,地西泮在任务的 10 分钟内的分钟时间进程,在雌性和雄性 C57BL/6J 小鼠中。此外,我们将地西泮的作用与选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(帕罗西汀,10mg/kg 腹腔注射,任务前 1 小时)的作用进行了对比。在任何测试剂量下,地西泮均无抗焦虑作用,而在最高剂量下,它会损害运动活性,可能是由于镇静作用。值得注意的是,当分别检查雄性和雌性小鼠时,当仅检查任务的前 5 分钟时,以及当动物在接受地西泮治疗前经受一小时的束缚诱导应激时,我们的结果仍然成立。相比之下,帕罗西汀显著降低了焦虑样行为,而没有引起镇静作用。因此,我们的结果表明,用于筛选新型抗焦虑药物的临床前研究应谨慎使用地西泮作为潜在的阳性对照。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdac/8085115/553a112aa249/41598_2021_88599_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验