Liu Yongjie, Xu Mingjie, Li Guoe, Wang Mingxia, Li Zhenqing, De Boeck Hans J
State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Apr 13;12:650802. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.650802. eCollection 2021.
Climate change is predicted to affect plant growth, but also the allocation of biomass to aboveground and belowground plant parts. To date, studies have mostly focused on aboveground biomass, while belowground biomass and allocation patterns have received less attention. We investigated changes in biomass allocation along a controlled gradient of precipitation in an experiment with four plant species (, , , and ) dominant in Inner Mongolia steppe. Results showed that aboveground biomass, belowground biomass and total biomass all increased with increasing growing season precipitation, as expected in this water-limited ecosystem. Biomass allocation patterns also changed along the precipitation gradient, but significant variation between species was apparent. Specifically, the belowground biomass: aboveground biomass ratio (i.e., B:A ratio) of was not impacted by precipitation amount, while B:A ratios of the other three species changed in different ways along the gradient. Some of these differences in allocation strategies may be related to morphological differences, specifically, the presence of rhizomes or stolons, though no consistent patterns emerged. Isometric partitioning, i.e., constant allocation of biomass aboveground and belowground, seemed to occur for one species (), but not for the three rhizome or stolon-forming ones. Indeed, for these species, the slope of the allometric regression between log-transformed belowground biomass and log-transformed aboveground biomass significantly differed from 1.0 and B:A ratios changed along the precipitation gradient. As changes in biomass allocation can affect ecosystem functioning and services, our results can be used as a basis for further studies into allocation patterns, especially in a context of environmental change.
据预测,气候变化不仅会影响植物生长,还会影响生物量在植物地上部分和地下部分的分配。迄今为止,研究大多集中在地上生物量,而地下生物量及其分配模式受到的关注较少。我们在一项实验中,沿着降水的可控梯度,对内蒙古草原上的四种优势植物物种(、、、)进行了研究,调查了生物量分配的变化。结果表明,正如在这个水资源有限的生态系统中所预期的那样,地上生物量、地下生物量和总生物量均随着生长季降水量的增加而增加。生物量分配模式也随着降水梯度而变化,但物种间存在明显的显著差异。具体而言,的地下生物量与地上生物量之比(即B:A比)不受降水量影响,而其他三个物种的B:A比则沿着梯度以不同方式变化。这些分配策略的一些差异可能与形态差异有关,特别是根茎或匍匐茎的存在,尽管没有出现一致的模式。等速分配,即地上和地下生物量的恒定分配,似乎在一个物种()中出现,但在三个形成根茎或匍匐茎的物种中没有出现。事实上,对于这些物种,对数转换后的地下生物量与对数转换后的地上生物量之间的异速生长回归斜率显著不同于1.0,且B:A比沿着降水梯度变化。由于生物量分配的变化会影响生态系统功能和服务,我们的研究结果可作为进一步研究分配模式的基础,尤其是在环境变化的背景下。