Department of Microbiology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Department of Ophthalmology, Guru Nanak Eye Center, New Delhi, India.
Lab Med. 2021 Nov 2;52(6):e154-e158. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmab033.
This study aims to evaluate the performance of an antigen-based rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
A cross-sectional study was conducted on 677 patients. Two nasopharyngeal swabs and 1 oropharyngeal swab were collected from patients. The RDT was performed onsite by a commercially available immune-chromatographic assay on the nasopharyngeal swab. The nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were examined for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by real-time reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay.
The overall sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 RDT was 34.5% and the specificity was 99.8%. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the test were 96.6% and 91.5%, respectively. The detection rate of RDT in RT-qPCR positive results was high (45%) for cycle threshold values <25.
The utility of RDT is in diagnosing symptomatic patients and may not be particularly suited as a screening tool for patients with low viral load. The low sensitivity of RDT does not qualify its use as a single test in patients who test negative; RT-qPCR continues to be the gold standard test.
本研究旨在评估一种基于抗原的 SARS-CoV-2 病毒快速诊断检测(RDT)的性能。
对 677 例患者进行了一项横断面研究。采集患者的 2 份鼻咽拭子和 1 份口咽拭子。通过市售的免疫层析测定法在鼻咽拭子上现场进行 RDT。通过实时逆转录定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)检测鼻咽和口咽拭子中的 SARS-CoV-2 RNA。
SARS-CoV-2 RDT 的总灵敏度为 34.5%,特异性为 99.8%。该检测的阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 96.6%和 91.5%。对于 Ct 值<25 的 RT-qPCR 阳性结果,RDT 的检测率较高(45%)。
RDT 的实用性在于诊断有症状的患者,可能不特别适合作为病毒载量低的患者的筛查工具。RDT 的低灵敏度不支持其在 RT-qPCR 检测结果为阴性的患者中作为单一检测方法使用;RT-qPCR 仍然是金标准检测。