Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021 Oct;46(10):1257-1264. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2020-1056. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
Despite compelling muscular structure and function changes resulting from blood flow restricted (BFR) resistance training, mechanisms of action remain poorly characterized. Alterations in tissue O saturation (TSI%) and metabolites are potential drivers of observed changes, but their relationships with degree of occlusion pressure are unclear. We examined local TSI% and blood lactate (BL) concentration during BFR training to failure using different occlusion pressures on strength, hypertrophy, and muscular endurance over an 8-week training period. Twenty participants (11 males/9 females) trained 3/wk for 8 wk using high pressure (100% resting limb occlusion pressure, LOP; 20% one-repetition maximum (1RM)), moderate pressure (50% LOP, 20%1RM), or traditional resistance training (TRT; 70%1RM). Strength, size, and muscular endurance were measured pre/post training. TSI% and BL were quantified during a training session. Despite overall increases, no group preferentially increased strength, hypertrophy, or muscular endurance ( > 0.05). Neither TSI% nor BL concentration differed between groups ( > 0.05). Moderate pressure resulted in greater accumulated deoxygenation stress (TSI% × time) (-6352 ± 3081, -3939 ± 1835, -2532 ± 1349 au for moderate pressure, high pressure, and TRT, = 0.018). We demonstrate that BFR training to task-failure elicits similar strength, hypertrophy, and muscular endurance changes to TRT. Further, varied occlusion pressure does not impact these outcomes or elicit changes in TSI% or BL concentrations. Training to task failure with low-load blood flow restriction elicits similar improvements to traditional resistance training, regardless of occlusion pressure. During blood flow restriction, altering occlusion pressure does not proportionally impact tissue O saturation nor blood lactate concentrations.
尽管血液限制(BFR)阻力训练会导致肌肉结构和功能发生明显变化,但作用机制仍不清楚。组织氧饱和度(TSI%)和代谢物的改变可能是观察到的变化的驱动因素,但它们与闭塞压力的关系尚不清楚。我们在 8 周的训练期间,使用不同的闭塞压力,研究了 BFR 训练至力竭时的局部 TSI%和血乳酸(BL)浓度对力量、肥大和肌肉耐力的影响。20 名参与者(11 名男性/9 名女性)每周训练 3 次,持续 8 周,分别采用高压(100%静息肢体闭塞压力,LOP;20%一次重复最大(1RM))、中压(50%LOP,20%1RM)或传统阻力训练(TRT;70%1RM)。训练前后测量了力量、大小和肌肉耐力。在训练过程中量化了 TSI%和 BL。尽管总体上有所增加,但没有一组优先增加力量、肥大或肌肉耐力(>0.05)。TSI%和 BL 浓度在组间无差异(>0.05)。中压导致更大的累积去氧应激(TSI%×时间)(-6352±3081,-3939±1835,-2532±1349au 中压、高压和 TRT,=0.018)。我们证明,BFR 训练至力竭会引起与 TRT 相似的力量、肥大和肌肉耐力变化。此外,不同的闭塞压力不会影响这些结果,也不会引起 TSI%或 BL 浓度的变化。使用低负荷血流限制进行训练至力竭,会产生与传统阻力训练相似的改善效果,而与闭塞压力无关。在血流限制期间,改变闭塞压力不会成比例地影响组织氧饱和度或血乳酸浓度。