• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在以重复力竭为训练目标时,通过优先改变组织缺氧或乳酸堆积来改善血流限制训练 8 周的训练反应是无效的。

Training response to 8 weeks of blood flow restricted training is not improved by preferentially altering tissue hypoxia or lactate accumulation when training to repetition failure.

机构信息

Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

出版信息

Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021 Oct;46(10):1257-1264. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2020-1056. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1139/apnm-2020-1056
PMID:33930277
Abstract

Despite compelling muscular structure and function changes resulting from blood flow restricted (BFR) resistance training, mechanisms of action remain poorly characterized. Alterations in tissue O saturation (TSI%) and metabolites are potential drivers of observed changes, but their relationships with degree of occlusion pressure are unclear. We examined local TSI% and blood lactate (BL) concentration during BFR training to failure using different occlusion pressures on strength, hypertrophy, and muscular endurance over an 8-week training period. Twenty participants (11 males/9 females) trained 3/wk for 8 wk using high pressure (100% resting limb occlusion pressure, LOP; 20% one-repetition maximum (1RM)), moderate pressure (50% LOP, 20%1RM), or traditional resistance training (TRT; 70%1RM). Strength, size, and muscular endurance were measured pre/post training. TSI% and BL were quantified during a training session. Despite overall increases, no group preferentially increased strength, hypertrophy, or muscular endurance ( > 0.05). Neither TSI% nor BL concentration differed between groups ( > 0.05). Moderate pressure resulted in greater accumulated deoxygenation stress (TSI% × time) (-6352 ± 3081, -3939 ± 1835, -2532 ± 1349 au for moderate pressure, high pressure, and TRT,  = 0.018). We demonstrate that BFR training to task-failure elicits similar strength, hypertrophy, and muscular endurance changes to TRT. Further, varied occlusion pressure does not impact these outcomes or elicit changes in TSI% or BL concentrations. Training to task failure with low-load blood flow restriction elicits similar improvements to traditional resistance training, regardless of occlusion pressure. During blood flow restriction, altering occlusion pressure does not proportionally impact tissue O saturation nor blood lactate concentrations.

摘要

尽管血液限制(BFR)阻力训练会导致肌肉结构和功能发生明显变化,但作用机制仍不清楚。组织氧饱和度(TSI%)和代谢物的改变可能是观察到的变化的驱动因素,但它们与闭塞压力的关系尚不清楚。我们在 8 周的训练期间,使用不同的闭塞压力,研究了 BFR 训练至力竭时的局部 TSI%和血乳酸(BL)浓度对力量、肥大和肌肉耐力的影响。20 名参与者(11 名男性/9 名女性)每周训练 3 次,持续 8 周,分别采用高压(100%静息肢体闭塞压力,LOP;20%一次重复最大(1RM))、中压(50%LOP,20%1RM)或传统阻力训练(TRT;70%1RM)。训练前后测量了力量、大小和肌肉耐力。在训练过程中量化了 TSI%和 BL。尽管总体上有所增加,但没有一组优先增加力量、肥大或肌肉耐力(>0.05)。TSI%和 BL 浓度在组间无差异(>0.05)。中压导致更大的累积去氧应激(TSI%×时间)(-6352±3081,-3939±1835,-2532±1349au 中压、高压和 TRT,=0.018)。我们证明,BFR 训练至力竭会引起与 TRT 相似的力量、肥大和肌肉耐力变化。此外,不同的闭塞压力不会影响这些结果,也不会引起 TSI%或 BL 浓度的变化。使用低负荷血流限制进行训练至力竭,会产生与传统阻力训练相似的改善效果,而与闭塞压力无关。在血流限制期间,改变闭塞压力不会成比例地影响组织氧饱和度或血乳酸浓度。

相似文献

1
Training response to 8 weeks of blood flow restricted training is not improved by preferentially altering tissue hypoxia or lactate accumulation when training to repetition failure.在以重复力竭为训练目标时,通过优先改变组织缺氧或乳酸堆积来改善血流限制训练 8 周的训练反应是无效的。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021 Oct;46(10):1257-1264. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2020-1056. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
2
Distinct adaptations of muscle endurance but not strength or hypertrophy to low-load resistance training with and without blood flow restriction.低负荷抗阻训练联合或不联合血流限制对肌肉耐力的适应具有独特性,但对力量和肥大无影响。
Exp Physiol. 2024 Jun;109(6):926-938. doi: 10.1113/EP091310. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
3
Acute cellular and molecular responses and chronic adaptations to low-load blood flow restriction and high-load resistance exercise in trained individuals.在训练有素的个体中,低负荷血流限制和高负荷抗阻运动的急性细胞和分子反应及慢性适应。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021 Dec 1;131(6):1731-1749. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00464.2021. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
4
Blood flow restriction does not augment low force contractions taken to or near task failure.血流限制不会增强接近或达到任务失败的低强度收缩。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2020 Jun;20(5):650-659. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2019.1664640. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
5
Low-load resistance training to task failure with and without blood flow restriction: muscular functional and structural adaptations.低负荷抗阻训练至力竭联合和不联合血流限制:肌肉功能和结构适应性。
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2020 Feb 1;318(2):R284-R295. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00243.2019. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
6
Magnitude of Muscle Strength and Mass Adaptations Between High-Load Resistance Training Versus Low-Load Resistance Training Associated with Blood-Flow Restriction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.高负荷抗阻训练与低负荷抗阻训练联合血流限制对肌肉力量和质量适应性的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2018 Feb;48(2):361-378. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0795-y.
7
Rest-pause and drop-set training elicit similar strength and hypertrophy adaptations compared with traditional sets in resistance-trained males.休息-暂停和递减组训练在抗阻训练的男性中引起的力量和肥大适应性与传统组相似。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021 Nov;46(11):1417-1424. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2021-0278. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
8
Similar Morphological and Functional Training Adaptations Occur Between Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction.连续和间歇性血流限制之间存在相似的形态和功能训练适应性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Jul 1;35(7):1784-1793. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004034.
9
The Impacts of Combined Blood Flow Restriction Training and Betaine Supplementation on One-Leg Press Muscular Endurance, Exercise-Associated Lactate Concentrations, Serum Metabolic Biomarkers, and Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α Gene Expression.联合血流限制训练和甜菜碱补充对单腿按压肌肉耐力、运动相关乳酸浓度、血清代谢生物标志物和缺氧诱导因子-1α基因表达的影响。
Nutrients. 2022 Nov 27;14(23):5040. doi: 10.3390/nu14235040.
10
Blood flow restricted training leads to myocellular macrophage infiltration and upregulation of heat shock proteins, but no apparent muscle damage.血流限制训练会导致肌细胞巨噬细胞浸润和热休克蛋白上调,但不会造成明显的肌肉损伤。
J Physiol. 2017 Jul 15;595(14):4857-4873. doi: 10.1113/JP273907. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Physiological adaptations and performance enhancement with combined blood flow restricted and interval training: A systematic review with meta-analysis.结合血流限制与间歇训练的生理适应及运动表现提升:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Sport Health Sci. 2025 Feb 20;14:101030. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101030.
2
Blood flow restriction training attenuates changes in local muscle endurance: At odds with previous work?血流限制训练可减轻局部肌肉耐力的变化:与先前的研究结果相悖?
Exp Physiol. 2024 Aug;109(8):1395-1398. doi: 10.1113/EP091924. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
3
Potential Moderators of the Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy: A Meta-analysis Based on a Comparison with High-Load Resistance Training.
血流限制训练对肌肉力量和肥大影响的潜在调节因素:基于与高负荷抗阻训练比较的荟萃分析
Sports Med Open. 2024 May 22;10(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00719-3.
4
Novel CO-encapsulated Pluronic F127 hydrogel for the treatment of Achilles tendon injury.新型共包封泊洛沙姆 F127 水凝胶治疗跟腱损伤。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 11;13(1):21895. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49339-z.