Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, United States; Department of Psychology, Florida International University, United States; Department of Psychology, University of Utah, United States.
Department of Psychology, Florida International University, United States.
Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Jul;117:105063. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105063. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
Despite evidence supporting Parent-Child Interaction Therapy's (PCIT) effectiveness for maltreatment prevention, its integration in child welfare services (CWS) has been challenging.
Using a pilot randomized controlled trial design, we evaluated the (1) feasibility of training therapists from CWS providers to implement home-based PCIT (2) feasibility of retaining parent-child dyads at-risk for child abuse in voluntary PCIT services, and (3) promise of PCIT for improving parenting skills.
Between 2015-2017, 23 therapists from CWS providers and 55 caregiver-child dyads who were determined to be at moderate-to-high risk for physical and/or emotional abuse, remained in the same home, and were referred for voluntary parenting services following a child protective investigation participated.
We trained 14 therapists in home-based PCIT and randomly assigned participating dyads to receive PCIT or services as usual (SAU). Dyads completed baseline and post-treatment assessments, including self-reported and observed parenting skills.
All therapists successfully completed the PCIT training; none completed full certification requirements. Of all randomized dyads, 51 % completed at least one treatment session, and the mean number of treatment sessions was 10.83. Caregivers assigned to PCIT used more self-reported (d = .72) and observed (d = .59) positive parenting skills post-treatment than caregivers assigned to SAU. Negative, inconsistent, and punitive parenting strategies and parenting stress did not significantly differ between caregivers assigned to PCIT and SAU.
Despite several challenges to feasibly implementing PCIT in community-based child welfare settings, even a small dose of PCIT improved positive parenting skills among at-risk parent-child dyads.
尽管有证据支持亲子互动疗法(PCIT)在预防虐待方面的有效性,但将其纳入儿童福利服务(CWS)一直具有挑战性。
本研究采用试点随机对照试验设计,评估了(1)从 CWS 提供者培训治疗师以实施家庭为基础的 PCIT 的可行性;(2)在自愿性 PCIT 服务中留住处于虐待儿童风险中的亲子对的可行性;以及(3)PCIT 改善育儿技能的潜力。
在 2015 年至 2017 年期间,23 名来自 CWS 提供者的治疗师和 55 名照顾者-儿童对参加了研究,这些儿童对身体和/或情感虐待的风险被确定为中高风险,他们仍留在同一个家庭中,并在儿童保护调查后被转介接受自愿性育儿服务。
我们对 14 名治疗师进行了家庭为基础的 PCIT 培训,并随机分配参与的亲子对接受 PCIT 或常规服务(SAU)。亲子对完成了基线和治疗后评估,包括自我报告和观察到的育儿技能。
所有治疗师都成功完成了 PCIT 培训;但没有一个人完成了完整的认证要求。在所有随机分配的亲子对中,有 51%完成了至少一次治疗,平均治疗次数为 10.83 次。接受 PCIT 治疗的照顾者在治疗后使用了更多的自我报告(d =.72)和观察(d =.59)的积极育儿技能,而接受 SAU 治疗的照顾者则没有。接受 PCIT 和 SAU 治疗的照顾者在消极、不一致和惩罚性育儿策略以及育儿压力方面没有显著差异。
尽管在社区为基础的儿童福利环境中实施 PCIT 存在一些挑战,但即使是少量的 PCIT 也能改善处于风险中的亲子对的积极育儿技能。