• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生和患者之间以及医生之间的鼻塞的侧别和严重程度没有相关性。

Laterality and severity of nasal obstruction does not correlate between physicians and patients, nor among physicians.

机构信息

Facial Plastic Surgery, Austin, TX, United States of America.

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, UT Southwestern, Dallas, TX, United States of America.

出版信息

Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Nov-Dec;42(6):103039. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103039. Epub 2021 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103039
PMID:33930682
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nasal obstruction is a common patient complaint and has a variety of etiologies, and a specific anatomical abnormality can often be found within the nasal cavity on physical examination. In practice, this observed pathology does not always correlate with the laterality, severity, and exact intranasal site of the patients' perceived obstruction.

OBJECTIVES

We seek to answer the following questions: 1) Does a physician's evaluation of nasal obstruction correlate with subjective patient complaints? 2) Is there reasonable correlation between physicians of similar training in the routine evaluation of nasal obstruction?

METHODS

First, we asked patients presenting to the otolaryngology clinic with a primary complaint of nasal obstruction to fill out a modified NOSE survey. Nasal endoscopy was performed on all subjects to assess all potential sites of obstruction. We then determined whether there is an association between patient complaints and findings on physical examination. Second, we determined if there is correlation between similarly trained physicians in their interpretation of a basic nasal examination. Otolaryngologists were shown a series of standardized videos of an endoscopic nasal examination that were recorded with a primary complaint of nasal obstruction. Findings were reported in an anonymous online survey focusing on laterality, severity, and specific site of perceived obstruction.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients were included in the first part of the study. The Cohen's kappa coefficient was used to determine the interrater agreement between the patient and physician in the degree of nasal obstruction. The kappa coefficient was 0.03 (p value 0.372) for the comparison of the left-sided scores (fair agreement), and 0.16 (p value 0.014) for the right-sided scores (slight agreement). A comparison was also done between the side of the nose the patient felt was most obstructed to the most obstructed side found on physical exam by the otolaryngologist. Thirteen of the 38 patients (34%) had perceived nasal obstruction on the opposite side of that noted to be most obstructed on physical exam. Despite this, the kappa coefficient in this comparison was 0.43 (p value <0.001) revealing moderate agreement between the two groups. Seventeen otolaryngologists participated in the second part of the study. Data extrapolated revealed very little agreement among the physicians in reporting which side of the nose was most obstructed, what anatomical structure contributed to the obstruction the most, and what percentage obstruction was present.

DISCUSSION

Based on our findings, patients can reasonably determine based on their symptoms which side is most obstructed, but symptoms do not correlate with severity of obstruction when compared to physical exam. There is also very little consistency between otolaryngologists in their assessment of the degree of nasal obstruction on exam. The results of this study may have far-reaching implications for patient management, surgical intervention, and medicolegal documentation as it relates to the current surgical treatment of nasal obstruction.

摘要

背景

鼻塞是一种常见的患者主诉,其病因多种多样,体格检查时通常可在鼻腔内发现特定的解剖结构异常。但实际上,这种观察到的病理变化并不总是与患者感知到的鼻塞的侧别、严重程度和确切的鼻腔内位置相关。

目的

我们旨在解答以下问题:1)医生对鼻塞的评估是否与患者的主观主诉相关?2)在对鼻塞的常规评估中,接受过相似培训的医生之间是否存在合理的相关性?

方法

首先,我们要求就诊于耳鼻喉科门诊、主诉为鼻塞的患者填写改良的 NOSE 问卷调查表。对所有患者进行鼻内镜检查,以评估所有潜在的鼻塞部位。然后,我们确定患者的主诉与体格检查结果之间是否存在关联。其次,我们确定在解释基本的鼻腔检查结果方面,接受过相似培训的医生之间是否存在相关性。耳鼻喉科医生观看了一系列记录有鼻塞主诉的鼻内镜检查的标准化视频,然后在一项匿名的在线调查中报告他们对侧别、严重程度和感知到的特定鼻塞部位的判断。

结果

本研究的第一部分共纳入 38 例患者。我们使用 Cohen's kappa 系数来评估患者和医生在鼻塞严重程度评估方面的评分一致性。左侧评分的 Cohen's kappa 系数为 0.03(p 值为 0.372)(一致性差),右侧评分的 Cohen's kappa 系数为 0.16(p 值为 0.014)(一致性弱)。我们还比较了患者自我报告感觉最阻塞的鼻腔侧别与耳鼻喉科医生在体格检查中发现的最阻塞侧别的相关性。在 38 例患者中,有 13 例(34%)患者感觉鼻塞的侧别与体格检查发现的最阻塞侧别相反。尽管如此,两组之间的 Cohen's kappa 系数为 0.43(p 值<0.001),表明两组之间存在中度一致性。17 名耳鼻喉科医生参与了本研究的第二部分。推断的数据显示,医生在报告哪一侧鼻腔最阻塞、哪一解剖结构最导致阻塞以及存在多大程度的阻塞方面几乎没有一致性。

讨论

根据我们的发现,患者可以根据症状合理判断哪一侧鼻塞最严重,但与体格检查相比,症状与鼻塞的严重程度并不相关。耳鼻喉科医生在评估鼻塞程度方面也几乎没有一致性。这项研究的结果可能对患者管理、手术干预和与当前鼻阻塞手术治疗相关的医疗法律文件具有深远的意义。

相似文献

1
Laterality and severity of nasal obstruction does not correlate between physicians and patients, nor among physicians.医生和患者之间以及医生之间的鼻塞的侧别和严重程度没有相关性。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Nov-Dec;42(6):103039. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103039. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
2
Nasal airway obstruction: Prevalence and anatomic contributors.鼻气道阻塞:患病率及解剖学因素
Ear Nose Throat J. 2018 Jun;97(6):173-176. doi: 10.1177/014556131809700615.
3
Reliability of a Standardized Nasal Anatomic Worksheet and Correlation With Subjective Nasal Airway Obstruction.标准化鼻腔解剖工作表的可靠性及其与主观鼻腔气道阻塞的相关性。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016 Dec 1;18(6):449-454. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.0721.
4
Diagnosis and management of septal deviation and nasal valve collapse - a survey of Canadian otolaryngologists.鼻中隔偏曲和鼻阀塌陷的诊断和治疗——加拿大耳鼻喉科医生的调查。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Dec 16;48(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40463-019-0394-z.
5
Type and severity of septal deviation are not related with the degree of subjective nasal obstruction.鼻中隔偏曲的类型和严重程度与主观鼻阻塞程度无关。
Rhinology. 2016 Dec 1;54(4):355-360. doi: 10.4193/Rhino15.226.
6
Computed tomography scan does not correlate with patient experience of nasal obstruction.计算机断层扫描与患者鼻塞的体验不相关。
Laryngoscope. 2016 Apr;126(4):820-5. doi: 10.1002/lary.25784. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
7
Radiographic evaluation of nasal septal deviation from computed tomography correlates poorly with physical exam findings.计算机断层扫描对鼻中隔偏曲的影像学评估与体格检查结果的相关性较差。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015 Mar;5(3):258-62. doi: 10.1002/alr.21445. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
8
Acoustic rhinometry and video endoscopic scoring to evaluate postoperative outcomes in endonasal spreader graft surgery with septoplasty and turbinoplasty for nasal valve collapse.采用鼻声反射和视频内镜评分评估鼻中隔成形术联合鼻甲成形术治疗鼻瓣膜塌陷的鼻内撑开植骨手术的术后效果。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jan 12;45:2. doi: 10.1186/s40463-016-0115-9.
9
Nasal airway obstruction: allergy and otolaryngology perspectives.鼻气道阻塞:过敏与耳鼻咽喉科视角
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Dec;101(6):593-8. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60221-9.
10
Unilateral Nasal Obstruction Causes Symptom Severity Scores Similar to Bilateral Nasal Obstruction.单侧鼻塞导致的症状严重程度评分与双侧鼻塞相似。
Facial Plast Surg. 2020 Aug;36(4):487-492. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714265. Epub 2020 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of septal deviation on postoperative quality of life in patients undergoing radiofrequency-assisted turbinate reduction.鼻中隔偏曲对接受射频辅助下鼻甲切除术患者术后生活质量的影响。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022 Feb 18;7(2):325-334. doi: 10.1002/lio2.759. eCollection 2022 Apr.