Suppr超能文献

盆腔炎性疾病临床诊疗回顾性研究:梅毒和艾滋病筛查的错失机会?

A Retrospective Study of Clinical Encounters for Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: Missed Opportunities to Screen for Syphilis and HIV?

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB; Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, MB.

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB; Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, MB.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 Sep;43(9):1047-1054.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.04.007. Epub 2021 Apr 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Missed screening opportunities may contribute to the rising rates of sexually transmitted and blood borne infections (STBBIs) in Manitoba. This study sought to determine the proportion of women who are screened for syphilis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) when admitted with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all inpatient admissions for PID over 3 discrete years (fiscal years 2007, 2012, 2017) at a single tertiary care centre. Data extracted from medical records included STBBI screening performed, clinical signs at presentation, and history of PID or STBBI. To improve the accuracy of our estimates, we complemented the records data with population data from Manitoba. We evaluated predictive factors influencing any or concurrent STBBI screening using bivariate analysis for significance (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

One hundred and five admissions met inclusion criteria. Syphilis and HIV screening was ordered concurrently with chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening in 6 (6%) of encounters and was ordered at any point during admission for PID in 28 (27%). A history of substance abuse (odds ratio [OR] 4.94 [95% CI 1.62-15.05] for syphilis screening and OR 6.94 [95% CI 2.38-20.23] for HIV screening) and a positive gonorrhea result while admitted (OR 3.40 [95% CI 1.06-10.88] for syphilis screening) were strongly associated with receiving any screening. Reporting multiple sexual partners was also strongly associated with receiving any STBBI screening while admitted (OR 19.44 [95% CI 2.01-187.92] and OR 15.00 [95% CI 1.58-142.70] for syphilis and HIV screening, respectively).

CONCLUSION

A minority of patients were screened for syphilis and HIV while admitted for PID. This study highlights a missed opportunity to screen for STBBI among sexually active women.

摘要

目的

曼尼托巴省性传播和血源感染(STBBI)发病率不断上升,漏诊筛查可能是原因之一。本研究旨在确定患有盆腔炎(PID)住院患者中筛查梅毒和人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的比例。

方法

我们对单家三级保健中心 3 年内(2007 年、2012 年和 2017 年财政年度)所有 PID 住院患者进行了回顾性分析。从病历中提取的数据包括进行的 STBBI 筛查、就诊时的临床体征以及 PID 或 STBBI 病史。为了提高估计的准确性,我们使用曼尼托巴省的人口数据补充了记录数据。我们使用双变量分析评估了影响任何或同时进行 STBBI 筛查的预测因素(P < 0.05)。

结果

105 例符合纳入标准。在 6 次就诊中,梅毒和 HIV 筛查与衣原体和淋病筛查同时进行,在 28 次 PID 住院期间的任何时间进行了筛查。滥用药物史(梅毒筛查的比值比[OR] 4.94[95%CI 1.62-15.05]和 HIV 筛查的 OR 6.94[95%CI 2.38-20.23])和入院时淋病阳性(梅毒筛查的 OR 3.40[95%CI 1.06-10.88])与接受任何筛查密切相关。报告有多个性伴侣也与住院期间接受任何 STBBI 筛查密切相关(梅毒和 HIV 筛查的 OR 分别为 19.44[95%CI 2.01-187.92]和 OR 15.00[95%CI 1.58-142.70])。

结论

少数 PID 住院患者接受了梅毒和 HIV 筛查。本研究强调了在性活跃女性中筛查 STBBI 的机会被错失。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验