Suppr超能文献

半月板根部撕裂患者根修复与部分半月板切除术及观察的疗效比较

Comparative Efficacy of Root Repair versus Partial Meniscectomy and Observation for Patients with Meniscus Root Tears.

作者信息

Dai Wenli, Yan Wenqiang, Leng Xi, Wang Junyan, Hu Xiaoqing, Ao Yingfang

机构信息

Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Institute of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Medical Imaging Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Knee Surg. 2023 Jan;36(1):29-38. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729622. Epub 2021 May 1.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to (1) compare the efficacy of root repair versus partial meniscectomy and observation for patients with meniscus root tears; (2) compare osteoarthritis (OA) progression and functional outcomes in patients with isolated repair and with adjuvant surgery; and (3) evaluate OA progression and functional outcomes after pullout repair or all-inside repair of meniscus root tears. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library up to September 1, 2020, to identify studies that evaluated the efficacy of root repair versus partial meniscectomy and observation in patients with meniscus root tears. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool data. A total of nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, with 485 patients comprising 238 in the root repair group, 113 in the partial meniscectomy group, and 134 in the observation group. The mean age of the patients ranged from 46.1 to 64.8 years. Compared with partial meniscectomy, root repair was associated with significantly lower postoperative Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade (mean difference [MD]: -0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.00 to -0.23) and progression to arthroplasty rate (odds ratio [OR]: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04-0.60) at final follow-up. Compared with observation, root repair was associated with significantly lower arthroplasty rate (OR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01-0.44) and better International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (MD: 8.07, 95% CI: 0.72-15.41) at final follow-up. Moreover, significantly lower postoperative K-L grade and progression to arthroplasty rate, as well as higher IKDC and Lysholm scores were seen in favor of root repair in patients with isolated meniscus root tears. Additionally, significantly lower OA progression and higher function scores were found in favor of root repair when the tears were repaired with pullout technique. Current evidence indicates that root repair with pullout technique may be a better choice than partial meniscectomy and observation for patients with isolated meniscus root tears as measured by OA progression, progression to arthroplasty, as well as functional outcomes.

摘要

本研究的目的是

(1)比较半月板根部撕裂患者进行根部修复与部分半月板切除术及观察的疗效;(2)比较单纯修复患者与辅助手术患者的骨关节炎(OA)进展和功能结局;(3)评估半月板根部撕裂的拔出修复或全内置修复后的OA进展和功能结局。我们在截至2020年9月1日的PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆中进行了系统的文献检索,以确定评估半月板根部撕裂患者根部修复与部分半月板切除术及观察疗效的研究。采用随机效应荟萃分析来汇总数据。荟萃分析共纳入9项研究,485例患者,其中根部修复组238例,部分半月板切除术组113例,观察组134例。患者的平均年龄在46.1至64.8岁之间。与部分半月板切除术相比,根部修复在末次随访时术后Kellgren-Lawrence(K-L)分级显著更低(平均差[MD]:-0.62,95%置信区间[CI]:-1.00至-0.23),进展为关节成形术的比率显著更低(比值比[OR]:0.15,95%CI:0.04 - 0.60)。与观察相比,根部修复在末次随访时关节成形术比率显著更低(OR:0.07,95%CI:0.01 - 0.44),国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分更好(MD:8.07,95%CI:0.72 - 15.41)。此外,单纯半月板根部撕裂患者中,根部修复术后K-L分级和进展为关节成形术的比率显著更低,IKDC和Lysholm评分更高。另外,当采用拔出技术修复撕裂时,根部修复的OA进展显著更低,功能评分更高。目前的证据表明,就OA进展、进展为关节成形术以及功能结局而言,对于单纯半月板根部撕裂患者,采用拔出技术进行根部修复可能是比部分半月板切除术及观察更好的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验