Forensic Odontology, Department of Imaging & Pathology, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, blok a - box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Faculty of Dentistry, Maranatha Christian University, Jalan Surya Sumantri no. 65, Sukawarna, Sukajadi, Kota Bandung, 40164, Indonesia.
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Dec;25(12):6681-6693. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03955-z. Epub 2021 May 2.
To evaluate the effect of third molar impaction and impaction-related parameters on third molar development.
Panoramic radiographs (N=3972) from 473 males and 558 females between 3.2 and 23.5 years old were analysed. Three parameters of impaction were examined: hindering contact between third and adjacent second molar, retromolar space availability (only in lower third molars), and angulation between the third and adjacent second molar. From the separate parameters, a definition for impaction was derived. Third molars' development was staged according to a modified Köhler et al. staging technique. A linear model was used to compare within-stage and overall age, as a function of hindering contact, retromolar space, and impaction. Furthermore, a quadratic function was used to study the correlation between age and angulation.
Significant differences were found in mean age as a function of hindering contact and retromolar space, depending on third molar location and stage. There was a significant relation between angulation and age, depending on the stage, with all third molars evolving to a more upright position (closer to 0°). Mean ages of subjects with impacted third molars were significantly lower in certain third molar stages, but the differences were clinically small (absolute differences ≤0.65 years). Moreover, after correction for stage differences, no significant differences in age could be demonstrated.
The development of impacted and non-impacted third molars can be considered clinically equal in our study population.
There is no distinction required between impacted and non-impacted third molars for dental age estimation.
评估第三磨牙阻生及相关参数对第三磨牙发育的影响。
分析了 473 名男性和 558 名 3.2 至 23.5 岁女性的全景片。检查了阻生的三个参数:第三磨牙与相邻第二磨牙之间的阻碍接触、磨牙后间隙的可用空间(仅在下颌第三磨牙中)以及第三磨牙与相邻第二磨牙之间的角度。从单独的参数中得出了阻生的定义。根据改良 Köhler 分期技术对第三磨牙的发育进行分期。线性模型用于比较同一阶段和整体年龄,以及阻碍接触、磨牙后间隙和阻生的影响。此外,还使用二次函数来研究年龄与角度之间的相关性。
根据第三磨牙的位置和阶段,在阻碍接触和磨牙后间隙的功能方面发现了平均年龄的显著差异。角度与年龄之间存在显著的关系,取决于阶段,所有第三磨牙都向更直立的位置(更接近 0°)演变。在某些第三磨牙阶段,阻生第三磨牙患者的平均年龄明显较低,但差异在临床上较小(绝对差异≤0.65 岁)。此外,在对阶段差异进行校正后,年龄差异无统计学意义。
在我们的研究人群中,阻生和非阻生第三磨牙的发育可以被认为在临床上是相等的。
在进行牙龄估计时,不需要区分阻生和非阻生的第三磨牙。