Comparison of a modified Story approach to traditional evaluation of acid-base disturbances in patients with shock: a cohort study.

To compare whether the diagnostic evaluation of metabolic acidosis can be improved by using a modified Story method compared to the traditional evaluation in a population of critically ill patients with shock. This prospective cohort study included shock patients admitted to the ICU of a tertiary hospital in Brazil between May 2018 and November 2019. We collected laboratory data necessary for traditional evaluation and the simplified Stewart's method. During the study period, 149 patients were included in the final analysis. Of the 17 patients with a normal SBE and AG, 13 (76.5%) presented with metabolic acidosis according to the modified Story assessment. Therefore, of the 149 patients included in the study, the traditional approach failed to identify metabolic acidosis that was identified by the modified Story assessment in 13 (8.7%) patients. In addition, the determination of the severity of metabolic acidosis also differed between the two methods by a mean of - 7.8 mEq/L. We found that a modified Story method can identify and quantify metabolic acidosis in patients with disorders that were not revealed by the traditional approach.