• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在台湾,对转移性 Merkel 细胞癌使用avelumab 的成本-效用分析。

A cost-utility analysis of avelumab for metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma in Taiwan.

机构信息

Division of Haematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021 Dec;4(6):e1399. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1399. Epub 2021 May 2.

DOI:10.1002/cnr2.1399
PMID:33934577
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8714552/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) has traditionally been managed with palliative chemotherapy regimens or best supportive care (BSC). Avelumab, a novel anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) human monoclonal antibody for mMCC treatment, is being studied in the pivotal JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial.

AIM

Incorporating trial results, this analysis aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of avelumab in Taiwan.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A de novo partitioned-survival model with three key health states related to survival (progression-free disease, progressed disease, and death) was applied in this study. The data of clinical efficacy, safety, and patient utilities were obtained from the JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial, literature review, and Taiwanese clinical expert opinion. Cost-utility analysis was performed, and results were presented as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. For treatment-naïve patients, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for avelumab vs BSC and avelumab vs chemotherapy were US$44885.06 and US$42993.06 per QALY gained, respectively. As to treatment-experienced mMCC patients, avelumab was associated with ICERs of US$27243.06 (vs BSC)/US$26557.43 (vs chemotherapy) per QALY gained. All ICERs remained consistently within the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$53,333.33 per QALY gained.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated avelumab to be a cost-effective treatment option for both treatment-experienced and treatment-naïve mMCC patients with very poor prognosis in Taiwan.

摘要

背景

转移性 Merkel 细胞癌(mMCC)传统上采用姑息性化疗方案或最佳支持治疗(BSC)进行治疗。avelumab 是一种用于 mMCC 治疗的新型抗程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)人源单克隆抗体,正在关键的 JAVELIN Merkel 200 试验中进行研究。

目的

结合试验结果,本分析旨在评估 avelumab 在台湾的成本效益。

方法和结果

本研究采用了一个新的分割生存模型,该模型有三个与生存相关的关键健康状态(无疾病进展、疾病进展和死亡)。临床疗效、安全性和患者效用数据来自 JAVELIN Merkel 200 试验、文献回顾和台湾临床专家意见。进行了成本效用分析,并以每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本(增量成本效益比,ICER)表示结果。对于初治患者,avelumab 与 BSC 和化疗相比的增量成本效益比(ICER)分别为每 QALY 增加 44885.06 美元和 42993.06 美元。对于有治疗经验的 mMCC 患者,avelumab 与 BSC 和化疗相比的 ICER 分别为每 QALY 增加 27243.06 美元和 26557.43 美元。所有 ICER 均保持在台湾每 QALY 增加 53333.33 美元的意愿支付(WTP)阈值内。

结论

本研究表明,avelumab 对于台湾预后极差的初治和有治疗经验的 mMCC 患者是一种具有成本效益的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
A cost-utility analysis of avelumab for metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma in Taiwan.在台湾,对转移性 Merkel 细胞癌使用avelumab 的成本-效用分析。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021 Dec;4(6):e1399. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1399. Epub 2021 May 2.
2
Real-world clinical outcomes with first-line avelumab in locally advanced/metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma in the USA: SPEAR-Merkel.在美国,一线avelumab 治疗局部晚期/转移性 Merkel 细胞癌的真实世界临床结局:SPEAR-Merkel。
Future Oncol. 2021 Jun;17(18):2339-2350. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-1250. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Avelumab Maintenance Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in the United States.阿维鲁单抗维持治疗用于美国晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌的成本效果分析。
Adv Ther. 2021 Dec;38(12):5710-5720. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01950-0. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
4
First-line avelumab treatment in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: 4-year follow-up from part B of the JAVELIN Merkel 200 study.在转移性 Merkel 细胞癌患者中进行一线avelumab 治疗:JAVELIN Merkel 200 研究 B 部分的 4 年随访结果。
ESMO Open. 2024 May;9(5):103461. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103461. Epub 2024 May 13.
5
Avelumab in patients with previously treated metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (JAVELIN Merkel 200): updated overall survival data after >5 years of follow-up.avelumab 治疗既往治疗的转移性 Merkel 细胞癌患者(JAVELIN Merkel 200):超过 5 年随访后的更新总生存数据。
ESMO Open. 2021 Dec;6(6):100290. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100290. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
6
Updated efficacy of avelumab in patients with previously treated metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma after ≥1 year of follow-up: JAVELIN Merkel 200, a phase 2 clinical trial.经过≥1 年随访后,阿维鲁单抗治疗既往治疗转移性 Merkel 细胞癌患者的疗效更新:JAVELIN Merkel 200,一项 2 期临床试验。
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Jan 19;6(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40425-017-0310-x.
7
Efficacy and Safety of First-line Avelumab Treatment in Patients With Stage IV Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Preplanned Interim Analysis of a Clinical Trial.一线阿维鲁单抗治疗 IV 期转移性 Merkel 细胞癌患者的疗效和安全性:一项临床试验的预先计划的中期分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;4(9):e180077. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0077. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
8
Cost Effectiveness of Avelumab for Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma.阿维鲁单抗治疗转移性默克尔细胞癌的成本效益
Pharmacoecon Open. 2019 Sep;3(3):377-390. doi: 10.1007/s41669-018-0115-y.
9
Avelumab in patients with previously treated metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: long-term data and biomarker analyses from the single-arm phase 2 JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial.avelumab 治疗既往治疗的转移性 Merkel 细胞癌患者:来自单臂 2 期 JAVELIN Merkel 200 试验的长期数据和生物标志物分析。
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 May;8(1). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000674.
10
Patient Experiences with Avelumab in Treatment-Naïve Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Longitudinal Qualitative Interview Findings from JAVELIN Merkel 200, a Registrational Clinical Trial.初治转移性默克尔细胞癌患者接受avelumab 治疗的体验:来自 JAVELIN Merkel 200 注册临床研究的纵向定性访谈结果。
Patient. 2020 Aug;13(4):457-467. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00428-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic evaluation of Merkel cell carcinoma clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE II instrument.使用AGREE II工具对默克尔细胞癌临床实践指南进行系统评价。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Apr 25;316(5):130. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-02853-0.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Optimisation with Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Solid Tumours: A Systematic Review.实体瘤免疫治疗中生物标志物优化治疗的成本效益:系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 29;16(5):995. doi: 10.3390/cancers16050995.
3
The effects of exposure to solar radiation on human health.

本文引用的文献

1
Avelumab in patients with previously treated metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: long-term data and biomarker analyses from the single-arm phase 2 JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial.avelumab 治疗既往治疗的转移性 Merkel 细胞癌患者:来自单臂 2 期 JAVELIN Merkel 200 试验的长期数据和生物标志物分析。
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 May;8(1). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000674.
2
Merkel cell carcinoma in Taiwan: A series of 24 cases and literature review.台湾的默克尔细胞癌:24例病例系列及文献综述
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(42):e17538. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017538.
3
Cost Effectiveness of Avelumab for Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma.
太阳辐射对人类健康的影响。
Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2023 May;22(5):1011-1047. doi: 10.1007/s43630-023-00375-8. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
4
The Use of Expert Elicitation among Computational Modeling Studies in Health Research: A Systematic Review.健康研究中计算建模研究中使用专家 elicitation:系统评价。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Jul;42(5):684-703. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211053794. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
阿维鲁单抗治疗转移性默克尔细胞癌的成本效益
Pharmacoecon Open. 2019 Sep;3(3):377-390. doi: 10.1007/s41669-018-0115-y.
4
The Chang Gung Research Database-A multi-institutional electronic medical records database for real-world epidemiological studies in Taiwan.长庚研究数据库-一个用于台湾真实世界流行病学研究的多机构电子病历数据库。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 May;28(5):593-600. doi: 10.1002/pds.4713. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
5
Anti-PD-1 and Anti-CTLA-4 Therapies in Cancer: Mechanisms of Action, Efficacy, and Limitations.癌症中的抗程序性死亡蛋白1(Anti-PD-1)和抗细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关蛋白4(Anti-CTLA-4)疗法:作用机制、疗效及局限性
Front Oncol. 2018 Mar 28;8:86. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00086. eCollection 2018.
6
Chang Gung Research Database: A multi-institutional database consisting of original medical records.长庚研究数据库:一个由原始病历组成的多机构数据库。
Biomed J. 2017 Oct;40(5):263-269. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
7
Evaluation of real-world treatment outcomes in patients with distant metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma following second-line chemotherapy in Europe.欧洲二线化疗后远处转移性默克尔细胞癌患者的真实世界治疗结局评估。
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 13;8(45):79731-79741. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19218. eCollection 2017 Oct 3.
8
Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England.重视与健康相关的生活质量:英国的EQ-5D-5L价值集。
Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):7-22. doi: 10.1002/hec.3564. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
9
Real-world treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma treated with chemotherapy in the USA.美国接受化疗的转移性 Merkel 细胞癌患者的真实世界治疗结局。
Future Oncol. 2017 Aug;13(19):1699-1710. doi: 10.2217/fon-2017-0187. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
10
Recent amendments to NICE's value-based assessment of health technologies: implicitly inequitable?英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)基于价值的卫生技术评估的近期修订:是否存在隐性不公平?
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Jun;17(3):239-242. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1330152. Epub 2017 May 23.