• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿维鲁单抗治疗转移性默克尔细胞癌的成本效益

Cost Effectiveness of Avelumab for Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

作者信息

Bullement Ash, Nathan Paul, Willis Anna, Amin Amerah, Lilley Cameron, Stapelkamp Ceilidh, Hatswell Anthony, Pescott Chris, Bharmal Murtuza

机构信息

BresMed, Sheffield, UK.

Delta Hat, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Pharmacoecon Open. 2019 Sep;3(3):377-390. doi: 10.1007/s41669-018-0115-y.

DOI:10.1007/s41669-018-0115-y
PMID:30680676
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6710317/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) is a rare and aggressive skin cancer. Until recently, there were no licensed treatment options for patients with mMCC, and prognosis was poor. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted for avelumab, a newly available treatment option for mMCC, versus standard care (SC), from a UK National Health Service perspective.

METHODS

A partitioned survival model was developed to assess the lifetime costs and effects of avelumab versus SC. Data from the JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial (NCT02155647) were used to inform estimates of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Unit costs and associated frequencies of use were informed by published literature and clinical expert opinion. Results were presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs, i.e. the cost per QALY gained) for treatment-experienced (TE) and treatment-naïve (TN) patients. Uncertainty was explored through a range of sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Discounting costs and QALYs at 3.5% per annum, avelumab was associated with ICERs of £35,274 (TE)/£39,178 (TN) per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results demonstrated that avelumab was associated with an 88.3% (TE)/69.3% (TN) probability of being cost effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold for end-of-life treatments of £50,000 per QALY gained. Results were most sensitive to alternative survival extrapolations and dosing assumptions.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis results suggest that avelumab is likely to be a cost-effective treatment option for UK mMCC patients. The results for TN patients are subject to some uncertainty, and a confirmatory analysis will be conducted with more mature data.

摘要

背景

转移性默克尔细胞癌(mMCC)是一种罕见且侵袭性强的皮肤癌。直到最近,对于mMCC患者还没有获批的治疗方案,且预后较差。从英国国家医疗服务体系的角度,对阿维鲁单抗(一种新的mMCC治疗选择)与标准治疗(SC)进行了成本效益分析。

方法

建立了一个分区生存模型,以评估阿维鲁单抗与SC的终身成本和效果。来自JAVELIN Merkel 200试验(NCT02155647)的数据用于估计质量调整生命年(QALY)。单位成本和相关使用频率由已发表的文献和临床专家意见提供。结果以治疗经验丰富(TE)和初治(TN)患者的增量成本效益比(ICER,即每获得一个QALY的成本)呈现。通过一系列敏感性分析探讨不确定性。

结果

按每年3.5%对成本和QALY进行贴现,阿维鲁单抗每获得一个QALY的ICER为35,274英镑(TE)/39,178英镑(TN)。概率敏感性分析结果表明,在每获得一个QALY的临终治疗支付意愿阈值为50,000英镑时,阿维鲁单抗具有成本效益的概率为88.3%(TE)/69.3%(TN)。结果对替代生存外推法和给药假设最为敏感。

结论

分析结果表明,阿维鲁单抗可能是英国mMCC患者具有成本效益的治疗选择。TN患者的结果存在一定不确定性,将用更成熟的数据进行验证性分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/739d/6710317/923b23ad4285/41669_2018_115_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/739d/6710317/738a8af6168a/41669_2018_115_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/739d/6710317/3cb58cf1897c/41669_2018_115_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/739d/6710317/4d31c2286a16/41669_2018_115_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/739d/6710317/7e910025c426/41669_2018_115_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/739d/6710317/19a62ec84071/41669_2018_115_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/739d/6710317/2ebc4134df51/41669_2018_115_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/739d/6710317/923b23ad4285/41669_2018_115_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/739d/6710317/738a8af6168a/41669_2018_115_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/739d/6710317/3cb58cf1897c/41669_2018_115_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/739d/6710317/4d31c2286a16/41669_2018_115_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/739d/6710317/7e910025c426/41669_2018_115_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/739d/6710317/19a62ec84071/41669_2018_115_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/739d/6710317/2ebc4134df51/41669_2018_115_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/739d/6710317/923b23ad4285/41669_2018_115_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost Effectiveness of Avelumab for Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma.阿维鲁单抗治疗转移性默克尔细胞癌的成本效益
Pharmacoecon Open. 2019 Sep;3(3):377-390. doi: 10.1007/s41669-018-0115-y.
2
A cost-utility analysis of avelumab for metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma in Taiwan.在台湾,对转移性 Merkel 细胞癌使用avelumab 的成本-效用分析。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021 Dec;4(6):e1399. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1399. Epub 2021 May 2.
3
Cost-effectiveness of avelumab first-line maintenance therapy for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in France.法国局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌成人患者一线维持治疗avelumab 的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 10;19(5):e0302548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302548. eCollection 2024.
4
Budget impact model of avelumab in patients with metastatic merkel cell carcinoma in the US.美国转移性默克尔细胞癌患者使用阿维鲁单抗的预算影响模型
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 May 22;11:349-359. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S202642. eCollection 2019.
5
Efficacy and Safety of First-line Avelumab Treatment in Patients With Stage IV Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Preplanned Interim Analysis of a Clinical Trial.一线阿维鲁单抗治疗 IV 期转移性 Merkel 细胞癌患者的疗效和安全性:一项临床试验的预先计划的中期分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;4(9):e180077. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0077. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
6
Avelumab Maintenance Treatment After First-line Chemotherapy in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma-A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.阿维鲁单抗用于晚期尿路上皮癌一线化疗后的维持治疗——一项成本效益分析
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2023 Feb;21(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis for avelumab first-line maintenance treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma in Scotland.苏格兰晚期尿路上皮癌avelumab 一线维持治疗的成本效果分析。
Future Oncol. 2024 Mar;20(8):459-470. doi: 10.2217/fon-2023-0372. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
8
Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.拓扑替康、聚乙二醇化脂质体盐酸多柔比星和紫杉醇用于晚期卵巢癌二线或后续治疗:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(9):1-132. iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10090.
9
Updated efficacy of avelumab in patients with previously treated metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma after ≥1 year of follow-up: JAVELIN Merkel 200, a phase 2 clinical trial.经过≥1 年随访后,阿维鲁单抗治疗既往治疗转移性 Merkel 细胞癌患者的疗效更新:JAVELIN Merkel 200,一项 2 期临床试验。
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Jan 19;6(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40425-017-0310-x.
10
A cost-effectiveness analysis of avelumab plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone as first-line maintenance treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in Taiwan.台湾地区局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌患者一线维持治疗中avelumab 联合最佳支持治疗对比最佳支持治疗单独应用的成本效果分析。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023 Oct;6(10):e1887. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1887. Epub 2023 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Adoptive cellular immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis to inform drug pricing.中国转移性结直肠癌患者接受过继性细胞免疫疗法联合化疗与单纯化疗的比较:一项为药物定价提供参考的成本效益分析
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 9;15:1590319. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1590319. eCollection 2025.
2
Different attitudes towards estimating indirect costs of disease: The example of cancer.对疾病间接成本估算的不同态度:以癌症为例。
J Public Health Res. 2025 Apr 17;14(2):22799036251326636. doi: 10.1177/22799036251326636. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of First-line Avelumab Treatment in Patients With Stage IV Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Preplanned Interim Analysis of a Clinical Trial.一线阿维鲁单抗治疗 IV 期转移性 Merkel 细胞癌患者的疗效和安全性:一项临床试验的预先计划的中期分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;4(9):e180077. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0077. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
2
Merkel Cell Carcinoma: An Update and Immunotherapy.默克尔细胞癌:最新进展与免疫疗法
Front Oncol. 2018 Mar 6;8:48. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00048. eCollection 2018.
3
Economic Evaluation of Bevacizumab for Treatment of Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer in Canada.
Systematic evaluation of Merkel cell carcinoma clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE II instrument.
使用AGREE II工具对默克尔细胞癌临床实践指南进行系统评价。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Apr 25;316(5):130. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-02853-0.
4
Sotorasib versus Docetaxel for treatment of US and Chinese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with KRAS p.G12C-mutated: A cost-effectiveness analysis to inform drug pricing.索托拉西布对比多西他赛治疗美国和中国 KRAS p.G12C 突变型局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌患者的成本效果分析:药物定价信息。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 15;102(50):e36387. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036387.
5
Cost-effectiveness of abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy in high-risk HR+/HER2-early breast cancer in China.阿贝西利联合内分泌治疗在中国高危HR+/HER2-早期乳腺癌中的成本效益
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Nov 27;21(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00499-9.
6
Prophylaxis for pneumonia in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma undergoing R-CHOP21 in China: a meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.中国接受 R-CHOP21 方案治疗的非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者肺炎的预防:一项荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 27;13(3):e068943. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068943.
7
Serplulimab Plus Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy for Treatment of US and Chinese Patients with Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Inform Drug Pricing.塞普鲁单抗联合化疗对比化疗治疗美国和中国广泛期小细胞肺癌患者的成本效果分析:为药物定价提供信息。
BioDrugs. 2023 May;37(3):421-432. doi: 10.1007/s40259-023-00586-6. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Abemaciclib in Early Breast Cancer Patients: One Size Fits All or Tailoring to Patients' Needs?阿贝西利在早期乳腺癌患者中的成本效益:一刀切还是按需定制?
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2023 Feb 16;15:147-161. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S387375. eCollection 2023.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of personalised versus standard dosimetry for selective internal radiation therapy with TheraSphere in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.用TheraSphere对肝细胞癌患者进行选择性内照射治疗时,个性化剂量测定与标准剂量测定的成本效益分析。
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 29;12:920073. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.920073. eCollection 2022.
10
Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment for American patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma.尼伏鲁单抗联合伊匹单抗作为不可切除恶性胸膜间皮瘤美国患者一线治疗的成本效益。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;10:947375. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.947375. eCollection 2022.
加拿大贝伐单抗治疗铂耐药复发性卵巢癌的经济学评估
Pharmacoecon Open. 2018 Mar;2(1):19-29. doi: 10.1007/s41669-017-0030-7.
4
Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated in the United States.纳武单抗在美国治疗晚期肾细胞癌患者中的成本效益。
Exp Hematol Oncol. 2018 Feb 9;7:4. doi: 10.1186/s40164-018-0095-8. eCollection 2018.
5
Merkel cell carcinoma: An update and review: Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and staging. Merkel 细胞癌:最新研究和综述:发病机制、诊断和分期。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Mar;78(3):433-442. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
6
Merkel cell carcinoma: An update and review: Current and future therapy. Merkel 细胞癌:更新与综述:当前与未来的治疗。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Mar;78(3):445-454. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
7
Nonprogression with avelumab treatment associated with gains in quality of life in metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma.avelumab 治疗可使转移性 Merkel 细胞癌患者的生活质量获益,且不影响疾病进展。
Future Oncol. 2018 Feb;14(3):255-266. doi: 10.2217/fon-2017-0470. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
8
Cost-effectiveness of Trifluridine/tipiracil for Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England and Wales.英国和威尔士既往治疗转移性结直肠癌患者中使用曲氟尿苷替匹嘧啶的成本效果分析。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Mar;17(1):e143-e151. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
9
Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England.重视与健康相关的生活质量:英国的EQ-5D-5L价值集。
Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):7-22. doi: 10.1002/hec.3564. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
10
Cost Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab vs. Standard-of-Care Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic NSCLC that Expresses High Levels of PD-L1 in the United States.帕博利珠单抗对比标准治疗化疗作为高 PD-L1 表达转移性非小细胞肺癌一线治疗在美国的成本效果分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Aug;35(8):831-844. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0527-z.