Suppr超能文献

急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后后扩张的临床和血管造影结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes of Postdilation after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.

Department of Cardiology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Apr 9;2021:6699812. doi: 10.1155/2021/6699812. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The effect of postdilation in patients with acute coronary syndrome is still controversial. This meta-analysis aims to analyze the clinical and angiographic outcomes of postdilation after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wangfang databases were searched from inception to August 30, 2020. Eligible studies from acute coronary syndrome patients treated with postdilation were included. The primary clinical outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), the secondary clinical outcomes comprised all-cause death, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization, and the angiographic outcomes were no reflow and slow reflow.

RESULTS

11 studies met inclusion criteria. In clinical outcomes, our pooled analysis demonstrated that the postdilation had a tendency of decreasing MACE (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-1.00;  = 0.05) but significantly increased all-cause death (OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.05-2.12;  = 0.03). No significant difference existed in stent thrombosis (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.40-1.26;  = 0.24), myocardial infarction (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 0.51-3.83;  = 0.51), and target vessel revascularization (OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.21-1.80;  = 0.37) between postdilation and non-postdilation groups. In angiographic outcomes, there were no significant differences in no reflow (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 0.54-2.65;  = 0.66) and slow reflow (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.93-1.35;  = 0.24) between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The postdilation tends to reduce the risk of MACE but significantly increases all-cause death, without significantly affecting stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and coronary TIMI flow grade. However, more randomized controlled trials are required for investigating the effect of postdilation for patients with acute coronary syndrome (registered by PROSPERO, CRD42020160748).

摘要

目的

急性冠状动脉综合征患者的后扩张效果仍存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在分析急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后后扩张的临床和血管造影结果。

方法

从建库至 2020 年 8 月 30 日,检索 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、中国知网和万方数据库,纳入接受后扩张治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的研究。主要临床结局为主要不良心血管事件(MACE),次要临床结局包括全因死亡、支架血栓形成、心肌梗死和靶血管血运重建,血管造影结局为无复流和慢复流。

结果

11 项研究符合纳入标准。在临床结局方面,我们的汇总分析表明,后扩张有降低 MACE 的趋势(OR=0.67,95%CI 0.45-1.00;=0.05),但显著增加全因死亡(OR=1.49,95%CI 1.05-2.12;=0.03)。支架血栓形成(OR=0.71,95%CI 0.40-1.26;=0.24)、心肌梗死(OR=1.40,95%CI 0.51-3.83;=0.51)和靶血管血运重建(OR=0.61,95%CI 0.21-1.80;=0.37)两组间差异无统计学意义。在血管造影结局方面,无复流(OR=1.19,95%CI 0.54-2.65;=0.66)和慢复流(OR=1.12,95%CI 0.93-1.35;=0.24)两组间差异无统计学意义。

结论

后扩张倾向于降低 MACE 风险,但显著增加全因死亡,对支架血栓形成、心肌梗死、靶血管血运重建和冠状动脉 TIMI 血流分级无显著影响。然而,需要更多的随机对照试验来研究急性冠状动脉综合征患者后扩张的效果(由 PROSPERO 注册,CRD42020160748)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc22/8055432/113aee45c44f/JITC2021-6699812.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验