Suppr超能文献

用于激光烧蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱高精度铜同位素分析的四种铜材料作为参考物质的表征

Characterization of Four Copper Materials for Application as Reference Materials for High Precision Copper Isotope Analysis by Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Multi-Collector Mass Spectrometry.

作者信息

Yang Zhaoping, Jackson Simon Edward, Skulski Thomas

机构信息

Geological Survey of Canada (GSC), Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Chem. 2021 Apr 15;9:617205. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.617205. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma multi-collector mass spectrometry (LA-MC-ICP-MS) allows rapid, highly precise measurements of Cu isotope ratios of native Cu and Cu-bearing minerals. However, the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cu-metal isotope standard NIST SRM976 that is commonly used to calibrate LA-MC-ICP-MS Cu isotope measurements of native Cu is no longer available. We have investigated the suitability of four Cu metal materials, SSC-1, SSC-3 and SSC-4 (cathode Cu metal rods) and CUPD-1 (Cu anode sawings), originally developed by the Canada Centre for Mineral and Energy Technology (CANMET) as certified reference materials for trace element analysis, as Cu isotope reference materials for LA-MC-ICP-MS analysis and solution nebulization (SN) of Cu. The Cu isotopic composition and homogeneity of these four materials were characterised by SN- and LA-MC-ICP-MS, and are reported for the first time. The bulk Cu isotopic compositions, expressed as δCu in per mil (‰) relative to NIST SRM976 with combined uncertainties (, = 2), of SSC-1, SSC-3 and SSC-4, determined utilizing SN-MC-ICP-MS, are identical within analytical uncertainty at 0.03 ± 0.07‰ ( = 29), 0.04 ± 0.04‰ ( = 28), and 0.05 ± 0.08‰ ( = 29), respectively; the composition of CUPD-1 is 2.14 ± 0.08‰ ( = 28). The compositions are 0.01 ± 0.07‰ ( = 29), 0.04 ± 0.06‰ ( = 29), 0.03 ± 0.06‰ ( = 28) and 2.15 ± 0.06‰ ( = 28), respectively, relative to the European Reference Material ERM®-AE633 Cu isotope standard. The Cu isotope homogeneity of the four new reference materials was assessed by determining whether multiple individual Cu isotope measurements made by LA-MC-ICP-MS analysis (43 µm spot size), using each of the other three reference materials as a calibrator, approximate a single normal distribution. We also investigate whether there are statistically significant differences between the mean δCu values of three independent data sets for each of the Cu isotope reference materials using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Normality tests (graphical assessment of normal distribution quantile-quantile plots, and the Shapiro-Wilk, Jarque-Bera and reduced chi-squared statistic tests) show that: 1) the Cu isotope data acquired on SSC-1, SSC-3, SSC-4 and CUPD-1 do not depart significantly from a normal distribution, 2) the scatter of the Cu isotope data is due to analytical uncertainty with 95% confidence, and 3) there are no other significant sources of scatter; e.g. heterogeneity of the reference materials. The results of one-way ANOVA reveal that the mean difference of the δCu value for each of the reference materials SSC-1, SSC-3, SSC-4 and CUPD-1 is statistically not significant at the 0.05 level. The mean δCu values with combined uncertainties (, = 2) of SSC-1, SSC-3, SSC-4 and CUPD-1, determined by LA-MC-ICP-MS using each of the other three reference materials as a calibration standard, are 0.03 ± 0.09‰ ( = 132), 0.05 ± 0.09‰ ( = 154), 0.03 ± 0.09‰ ( = 144) and 2.14 ± 0.10‰ ( = 106), respectively. These values are in agreement with those determined by SN-MC-ICP-MS analysis at the 95% confidence level and have excellent precision (2 s.d. ≤ 0.10‰). These results suggest that SSC-1, SSC-3, SSC-4 and CUPD-1 can be considered isotopically homogeneous at a spatial resolution of 43 μm, and they are suitable reference materials for calibration and quality control of and solution nebulization Cu isotope analyses of Cu.

摘要

激光烧蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱法(LA-MC-ICP-MS)能够快速、高精度地测量天然铜及含铜矿物的铜同位素比值。然而,常用于校准LA-MC-ICP-MS对天然铜进行铜同位素测量的美国国家标准与技术研究院铜金属同位素标准物质NIST SRM976已不再可用。我们研究了四种铜金属材料,即加拿大矿业与能源技术中心(CANMET)最初开发的用于微量元素分析的认证参考物质SSC-1、SSC-3和SSC-4(阴极铜金属棒)以及CUPD-1(铜阳极锯屑),作为用于LA-MC-ICP-MS分析及铜溶液雾化(SN)的铜同位素参考物质的适用性。通过SN-ICP-MS和LA-MC-ICP-MS对这四种材料的铜同位素组成和均匀性进行了表征,并首次进行了报道。利用SN-MC-ICP-MS测定,SSC-1、SSC-3和SSC-4的整体铜同位素组成,以相对于NIST SRM976的千分比(‰)表示的δCu及合成不确定度(, = 2),在分析不确定度范围内分别为0.03 ± 0.07‰( = 29)、0.04 ± 0.04‰( = 28)和0.05 ± 0.08‰( = 29);CUPD-1的组成为2.14 ± 0.08‰( = 28)。相对于欧洲参考物质ERM®-AE633铜同位素标准,其组成分别为0.01 ± 0.07‰( = 29)、0.04 ± 0.06‰( = 29)、0.03 ± 0.06‰( = 28)和2.15 ± 0.06‰( = 28)。通过使用其他三种参考物质中的每一种作为校准标准,采用LA-MC-ICP-MS分析(43微米光斑尺寸)进行多次单独的铜同位素测量,以确定这四种新参考物质的铜同位素均匀性,看其是否近似单一正态分布。我们还使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)研究了每种铜同位素参考物质的三个独立数据集的平均δCu值之间是否存在统计学上的显著差异。正态性检验(对正态分布分位数-分位数图的图形评估以及Shapiro-Wilk、Jarque-Bera和简化卡方统计检验)表明:1)在SSC-1、SSC-3、SSC-4和CUPD-1上获取的铜同位素数据与正态分布没有显著偏差,2)铜同位素数据的离散是由于95%置信度下的分析不确定度,3)不存在其他显著的离散来源;例如参考物质的不均匀性。单因素方差分析结果表明,参考物质SSC-1、SSC-3、SSC-4和CUPD-1各自的δCu值的平均差异在0.05水平上在统计学上不显著。使用其他三种参考物质中的每一种作为校准标准,通过LA-MC-ICP-MS测定的SSC-1、SSC-3、SSC-4和CUPD-1的平均δCu值及合成不确定度(, = 2)分别为0.03 ± 0.09‰( = 132)、0.05 ± 0.09‰( = 154)、0.03 ± 0.09‰( = 144)和2.14 ± 0.10‰( = 106)。这些值在95%置信水平下与通过SN-MC-ICP-MS分析测定的值一致,并且具有出色的精密度(2标准偏差≤ 0.10‰)。这些结果表明,在43微米的空间分辨率下,SSC-1、SSC-3、SSC-4和CUPD-1可被视为同位素均匀的,并且它们是用于铜的LA-MC-ICP-MS和溶液雾化铜同位素分析校准及质量控制的合适参考物质。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ff3/8082442/0eaa782d26f2/fchem-09-617205-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验