Suppr超能文献

战争纪念活动对外交支持的影响:一项五国研究。

The Effect of War Commemorations on Support for Diplomacy: A Five-Nation Study.

作者信息

Watkins Hanne M, Li Mengyao, Allard Aurélien, Leidner Bernhard

机构信息

University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA.

Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Feb;48(2):315-327. doi: 10.1177/01461672211010625. Epub 2021 May 3.

Abstract

We remember the past in order not to repeat it, but does remembrance of war in fact shape support for military or diplomatic approaches to international conflict? In seven samples from five countries (collected online, total = 2,493), we examined support for military and diplomatic approaches to conflict during war commemorations (e.g., Veterans Day). During war commemorations in the United States, support for diplomacy increased, whereas support for military approaches did not change. We found similar results in the United Kingdom and Australia on Remembrance Day, but not in Germany, or France, nor in Australia on Anzac Day. Furthermore, support for diplomacy was predicted by concern about loss of ingroup military lives during war, independently of concern about harm to outgroup civilians. These studies expand our understanding of how collective memories of war may be leveraged to promote diplomatic approaches to contemporary geopolitical conflict.

摘要

我们铭记过去是为了不再重蹈覆辙,但对战争的铭记实际上是否会影响人们对处理国际冲突的军事或外交手段的支持呢?在来自五个国家的七个样本(通过网络收集,共2493人)中,我们研究了在战争纪念日(如退伍军人节)期间,人们对处理冲突的军事和外交手段的支持情况。在美国的战争纪念日期间,人们对外交手段的支持增加了,而对军事手段的支持没有变化。我们在英国和澳大利亚的阵亡将士纪念日也发现了类似的结果,但在德国、法国以及澳大利亚的澳新军团日没有发现这样的结果。此外,对战争期间本群体军人生命损失的担忧能够预测人们对外交手段的支持,这与对外群体平民所受伤害的担忧无关。这些研究拓展了我们对于如何利用战争的集体记忆来推动针对当代地缘政治冲突的外交手段的理解。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验