Department of Anaesthesiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGI), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGI), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ann Card Anaesth. 2021 Jan-Mar;24(1):49-55. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_45_19.
Rigid bronchoscopy (RB) procedures require continuous vigilance and monitoring. Such procedures warrant proper ventilation strategy and titration of potent short-acting anesthetics.
To compare propofol with the propofol-dexmedetomidine in conjunction with topical airway anesthesia in two groups during spontaneous assisted ventilation on peri-procedural hemodynamic stability.
This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was done on 40 patients who were randomized in two groups, 20 patients in each group; PS (Propofol+ Normal saline) and PD (Propofol+ Dexmedetomidine) group. All patients in both groups were induced with 1' IV propofol (1-3 mg/kg), IV midazolam (0.05 mg/kg), and IV fentanyl (2 μ/kg). PS group received propofol infusion for maintenance along with saline infusion 10 min before induction, whereas PD group also received propofol infusion for maintenance along with Injection dexmedetomidine infusion 10 min before induction. Outcome measured were heart rate (HR), mean blood pressure (MBP), oxygen saturation (SpO), and post-procedure awakening using Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAAS) scale and complications.
In both the groups, MBP decreased significantly from baseline, however, when MBP were compared at the same time points between the groups there were no significant differences. In PD group, HR remained significantly lower when compared with baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 min time points when compared with PS group. Number of patients who developed hypotension requiring vasoactive drugs, their mean dose and duration of hypotension were more in PD group, and they awoke with significant delay.
Propofol is better than combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine when given in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for RB in view of early awakening, lesser duration of intra-procedural hypotension, and lesser requirement of vasoactive agents.
硬质支气管镜(RB)程序需要持续的警惕和监测。此类程序需要适当的通气策略和强效短效麻醉剂的滴定。
比较丙泊酚与丙泊酚-右美托咪定联合局部气道麻醉在两组患者中在自主辅助通气下围手术期血流动力学稳定性的差异。
这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究,共纳入 40 例患者,随机分为两组,每组 20 例;PS(丙泊酚+生理盐水)和 PD(丙泊酚+右美托咪定)组。所有患者在两组中均以 1'IV 丙泊酚(1-3mg/kg)、IV 咪达唑仑(0.05mg/kg)和 IV 芬太尼(2μg/kg)诱导。PS 组在诱导前 10 分钟给予丙泊酚输注维持治疗,并输注生理盐水,PD 组也在诱导前 10 分钟给予丙泊酚输注维持治疗和右美托咪定注射。观察指标包括心率(HR)、平均血压(MBP)、氧饱和度(SpO)和术后苏醒情况(采用改良观察者警觉/镇静评分量表(MOAAS))以及并发症。
两组患者的 MBP 均较基线显著降低,但组间相同时间点的 MBP 比较无显著差异。PD 组 HR 与基线相比及与 PS 组在 6、12、18 和 24 分钟时相比均显著降低。需要血管活性药物治疗低血压的患者人数、其平均剂量和低血压持续时间在 PD 组更多,且苏醒延迟。
在 RB 中联合局部气道麻醉时,与丙泊酚-右美托咪定联合使用相比,丙泊酚苏醒更早、术中低血压持续时间更短、血管活性药物需求更少。