Offodile Anaeze C, Cerullo Marcelo, Bindal Mohini, Rauh-Hain Jose Alejandro, Ho Vivian
Anaeze C. Offodile II (
Marcelo Cerullo is a resident in the General Surgery Residency Program, Duke University Hospital, in Durham, North Carolina.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 May;40(5):719-726. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01535.
Private equity firms have increased their participation in the US health care system, raising questions about incentive alignment and downstream effects on patients. However, there is a lack of systematic characterization of private equity acquisition of short-term acute care hospitals. We present an overview of the scope of private equity-backed hospital acquisitions over the course of 2003-17, comparing the financial and operational differences between those hospitals and hospitals that remained unacquired through 2017. A total of 42 private equity deals occurred, involving 282 unique hospitals across 36 states. In unadjusted analyses, hospitals that were acquired had larger bed sizes, more discharges, and more full-time-equivalent staff positions in 2003 relative to nonacquired hospitals; private equity-acquired hospitals also had higher charge-to-cost ratios and higher operating margins, and this gap widened during our study period. These findings motivate evaluations by policy makers and researchers on the impact, if any, of private equity acquisition on health care access, spending, and risk-adjusted outcomes.
私募股权公司增加了对美国医疗保健系统的参与,引发了有关激励措施一致性以及对患者的下游影响的问题。然而,对于私募股权对短期急症医院的收购,缺乏系统性的描述。我们概述了2003年至2017年期间私募股权支持的医院收购范围,比较了这些医院与到2017年仍未被收购的医院之间的财务和运营差异。总共发生了42笔私募股权交易,涉及36个州的282家不同的医院。在未经调整的分析中,相对于未被收购的医院,2003年被收购的医院床位规模更大、出院人数更多、全职等效员工岗位更多;私募股权收购的医院收费成本比和营业利润率也更高,并且在我们的研究期间这种差距有所扩大。这些发现促使政策制定者和研究人员评估私募股权收购对医疗保健可及性、支出和风险调整后结果的影响(如果有的话)。