Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
PLoS One. 2021 May 3;16(5):e0250434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250434. eCollection 2021.
HIV self-testing (HIV-ST) is an effective means of improving HIV testing rates. Low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) are taking steps to include HIV-ST into their national HIV/AIDS programs but very few reviews have focused on implementation in LMIC. We performed a scoping review to describe and synthesize existing literature on implementation outcomes of HIV-ST in LMIC.
We conducted a systematic search of Medline, Embase, Global Health, Web of Science, and Scopus, supplemented by searches in HIVST.org and other grey literature databases (done 23 September 2020) and included articles if they reported at least one of the following eight implementation outcomes: acceptability, appropriateness, adoption, feasibility, fidelity, cost, penetration, or sustainability. Both quantitative and qualitative results were extracted and synthesized in a narrative manner.
Most (75%) of the 206 included articles focused on implementation in Africa. HIV-ST was found to be acceptable and appropriate, perceived to be convenient and better at maintaining confidentiality than standard testing. The lack of counselling and linkage to care, however, was concerning to stakeholders. Peer and online distribution were found to be effective in improving adoption. The high occurrence of user errors was a common feasibility issue reported by studies, although, diagnostic accuracy remained high. HIV-ST was associated with higher program costs but can still be cost-effective if kit prices remain low and HIV detection improves. Implementation fidelity was not always reported and there were very few studies on, penetration, and sustainability.
Evidence supports the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of HIV-ST in the LMIC context. Costs and user error rates are threats to successful implementation. Future research should address equity through measuring penetration and potential barriers to sustainability including distribution, cost, scale-up, and safety.
HIV 自我检测(HIV-ST)是提高 HIV 检测率的有效手段。中低收入国家(LMIC)正在采取措施将 HIV-ST 纳入其国家艾滋病规划,但很少有综述关注 LMIC 中的实施情况。我们进行了范围综述,以描述和综合现有文献中关于 LMIC 中 HIV-ST 的实施结果。
我们对 Medline、Embase、全球健康、Web of Science 和 Scopus 进行了系统搜索,并用 HIVST.org 和其他灰色文献数据库进行了补充(2020 年 9 月 23 日完成),并收录了至少报告以下 8 种实施结果之一的文章:可接受性、适当性、采用、可行性、保真度、成本、渗透率或可持续性。以叙述的方式提取和综合了定量和定性结果。
206 篇纳入文章中,大多数(75%)关注非洲的实施情况。HIV-ST 被认为是可接受和适当的,被认为比标准检测更方便、更能保护隐私。然而,缺乏咨询和与护理的联系引起了利益相关者的关注。同伴和在线分发被发现可以有效地提高采用率。研究报告称,用户错误的高发生率是常见的可行性问题,尽管诊断准确性仍然很高。HIV-ST 与较高的项目成本相关,但如果试剂盒价格保持较低且 HIV 检测得到改善,仍具有成本效益。实施保真度并不总是被报告,而且关于渗透率和可持续性的研究很少。
证据支持 HIV-ST 在 LMIC 环境中的可接受性、适当性和可行性。成本和用户错误率是成功实施的威胁。未来的研究应通过测量渗透率和可持续性的潜在障碍,包括分配、成本、扩大规模和安全性,来解决公平问题。