Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jul;151:e579-e598. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.082. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
The best surgical treatment for adult Chiari malformation type 1 remains widely debated.
This study aimed to assess the efficacy of posterior fossa decompression and duraplasty with arachnoid preservation compared with arachnoid dissection for the treatment of adult Chiari malformation type 1.
Two reviewers (M.O.-G. and M.A.) performed a PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase literature search using the following terms: ("Chiari" OR "Chiari 1") AND ("duraplasty" OR "arachnoid preservation" OR "arachnoid spar∗" OR "posterior fossa surgery" OR "posterior fossa decompression" OR "foramen magnum decompression"). Studies assessing the efficacy of posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty for the treatment of patients aged >18 years with Chiari malformation type 1 were included. Case reports with <10 patients, editorials, and non-English studies were excluded.
Of 195 studies identified, 24 were included for meta-analysis. In the 1006 participants, there was no difference in postoperative clinical or radiologic improvement between the 2 techniques. Patients who underwent posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty and arachnoid dissection had a greater prevalence of total complications (0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.29 vs. 0.09, 95% CI, 0.05-0.14; Q = 6.47; P = 0.01) and cerebrospinal fluid-related complications (0.15, 95% CI, 0.10-0.22 vs. 0.05, 95% CI, 0.02-0.12; Q = 4.88; P = 0.03) compared with arachnoid preservation. Furthermore, the prevalence of reoperation in the arachnoid dissection group was 25 times greater than in the arachnoid preservation group (0.08, 95% CI, 0.06-0.10 vs. 0.003, 95% CI, 0.00-0.02; Q = 10.73; P > 0.001).
Posterior fossa decompression and duraplasty with arachnoid preservation is a beneficial technique to treat Chiari malformation type 1 and reduces the risk of complications, particularly cerebrospinal fluid-related complications and the rate of reoperation.
成人 Chiari 畸形 1 型的最佳手术治疗方法仍存在广泛争议。
本研究旨在评估后颅窝减压和硬脑膜成形术伴蛛网膜保留与蛛网膜解剖相比,在治疗成人 Chiari 畸形 1 型中的疗效。
两名审查员(M.O.-G. 和 M.A.)使用以下术语对 PubMed、MEDLINE 和 Embase 文献进行了检索:(“Chiari”或“Chiari 1”)和(“硬脑膜成形术”或“蛛网膜保留”或“蛛网膜 Spar∗”或“后颅窝手术”或“后颅窝减压”或“枕骨大孔减压”)。纳入评估后颅窝减压伴硬脑膜成形术治疗年龄>18 岁 Chiari 畸形 1 型患者的疗效的研究。排除病例报告少于 10 例、社论和非英语研究。
在确定的 195 项研究中,有 24 项进行了荟萃分析。在 1006 名参与者中,两种技术的术后临床或影像学改善无差异。行后颅窝减压伴硬脑膜成形术和蛛网膜解剖的患者总并发症发生率更高(0.20,95%置信区间 [CI],0.13-0.29 与 0.09,95%CI,0.05-0.14;Q=6.47;P=0.01)和脑脊液相关并发症(0.15,95%CI,0.10-0.22 与 0.05,95%CI,0.02-0.12;Q=4.88;P=0.03)与蛛网膜保留组相比。此外,蛛网膜解剖组的再手术发生率是蛛网膜保留组的 25 倍(0.08,95%CI,0.06-0.10 与 0.003,95%CI,0.00-0.02;Q=10.73;P>0.001)。
后颅窝减压和硬脑膜成形术伴蛛网膜保留是治疗 Chiari 畸形 1 型的有益技术,可降低并发症风险,特别是脑脊液相关并发症和再手术率。