National Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, Australia.
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2021 Aug;44:101397. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2021.101397. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
There has been little attempt to date to narrow the education-practice gap in naturopathic medicine. A framework that brings naturopathic medicine education and practice closer together could help codify the knowledge of naturopathic medicine by providing simultaneous guidance on curriculum development and clinical decision-making in the discipline.
To develop, refine and validate the Advancing Naturopathic Education and Practice (ADVANCER) framework.
Published literature and pertinent government, professional association and institutional websites were scoped to identify key constructs for the ADVANCER framework. The constructs were grouped into ten domains, with each domain defined and translated into teaching and clinical practice outcomes. A two-round e-Delphi method, comprising international experts in naturopathic medicine education, was used to refine and validate the framework definitions and outcomes.
Sixteen academics, from five different countries, participated in the Delphi study. In round one, nine of the ten domains of the ADVANCER framework were rated as either very important or extremely important by 81.2% of participants. Only 68.8% of participants rated the tenth domain as either very important or extremely important. Participant feedback on each domain were pooled and reviewed, and where suggested changes were recommended by more than one participant, respective definitions and outcomes of each domain were amended. In round two, at least 90% of participants rated each domain of the amended ADVANCER framework as either very important or extremely important, meaning consensus to retain these domains, definitions and outcomes had been reached.
The study findings indicate that the ADVANCER framework is conceptually sound and potentially applicable to diverse institutions and countries. An important next step of this research is to establish whether implementation of the ADVANCER framework within naturopathic medicine education and practice is feasible, effective and sustainable.
迄今为止,在顺势疗法医学中,几乎没有尝试缩小教育与实践之间的差距。一个可以使顺势疗法医学教育与实践更加紧密结合的框架,可以通过为课程开发和学科临床决策提供同时指导,帮助编纂顺势疗法医学的知识。
制定、完善和验证推进顺势疗法教育和实践(ADVANCER)框架。
对已发表的文献以及相关政府、专业协会和机构网站进行了研究,以确定 ADVANCER 框架的关键结构。这些结构被分为十个领域,每个领域都有定义,并转化为教学和临床实践成果。采用两轮电子德尔菲法,包括来自五个不同国家的顺势疗法医学教育专家,对框架定义和成果进行了完善和验证。
共有 16 名学者参加了德尔菲研究,他们分别来自五个不同的国家。在第一轮中,ADVANCER 框架的十个领域中有九个被 81.2%的参与者评为非常重要或极其重要。只有 68.8%的参与者认为第十个领域非常重要或极其重要。参与者对每个领域的反馈进行了汇总和审查,只要有一位以上的参与者建议做出更改,就对每个领域的相应定义和成果进行了修订。在第二轮中,至少有 90%的参与者对修订后的 ADVANCER 框架的每个领域都评为非常重要或极其重要,这意味着已就保留这些领域、定义和成果达成共识。
研究结果表明,ADVANCER 框架在概念上是合理的,并且可能适用于不同的机构和国家。该研究的下一步重要举措是确定在顺势疗法医学教育和实践中实施 ADVANCER 框架是否可行、有效和可持续。