University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, 113 Večna pot, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
University of Cartagena, Environmental and Computational Chemistry Group, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zaragocilla Campus, 130015 Cartagena, Colombia.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 15;773:145576. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145576. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
Microplastics in the environment occur in different sizes and shapes and are made of various polymers. Therefore, they also considerably differ in their properties and ecotoxicity. However, the majority of microplastics research uses pre-made spherical microplastics, which practically do not exist in the environment. Our work focused on a comprehensive study of six different types of microplastic that were prepared to simulate common microplastics found in the environment. All types of microplastics where chemically and physically characterized using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, thermal analysis, field-emission scanning electron microscopy, optical microscopy and laser diffraction analysis. The specific surface area was determined using the BET method. Furthermore, effects of microplastics and microplastic leachates on a common duckweed (Lemna minor) were evaluated. All tested microplastics did not affect specific growth rate and chlorophyll a content in duckweed, while microplastics with a rough surface and sharp edges caused a significant reduction of duckweed root length. Microplastics made of Bakelite also showed an intensive leaching, which increased their ecotoxicity potential. Natural particles used as a control did not have any negative effect on duckweed. Overall, microplastic particles have significantly different ecotoxicity profiles depending on their physico-chemical properties. Therefore, the testing of environmentally relevant particles and their proper characterization, as well as the testing of microplastic leaching properties, is crucial for understanding of microplastics ecotoxicological potential.
环境中的微塑料有不同的大小和形状,由各种聚合物制成。因此,它们在性质和生态毒性方面也有很大的差异。然而,大多数微塑料研究使用预先制备的球形微塑料,而这些微塑料在环境中实际上并不存在。我们的工作侧重于对六种不同类型的微塑料进行综合研究,这些微塑料是为了模拟环境中常见的微塑料而制备的。所有类型的微塑料都使用傅里叶变换红外光谱、热分析、场发射扫描电子显微镜、光学显微镜和激光衍射分析进行了化学和物理特性表征。比表面积通过 BET 法确定。此外,还评估了微塑料和微塑料浸出物对常见浮萍(浮萍)的影响。所有测试的微塑料都不会影响浮萍的比增长率和叶绿素 a 含量,而表面粗糙、边缘锋利的微塑料会显著降低浮萍的根长。胶木制成的微塑料也表现出强烈的浸出,从而增加了其生态毒性潜力。用作对照的天然颗粒对浮萍没有任何负面影响。总的来说,微塑料颗粒的生态毒性特征因理化性质而异。因此,对环境相关颗粒的测试及其适当的表征,以及对微塑料浸出特性的测试,对于理解微塑料的生态毒性潜力至关重要。