Suppr超能文献

严重过敏反应的危险因素:食物还是共因素更重要?

Risk Factors in Severe Anaphylaxis: Which Matters the Most, Food or Cofactors?

机构信息

FAllergy Section, Pneumology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

IRCE - Institut d´Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2022 Jul 22;32(4):282-290. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0698. Epub 2021 May 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of anaphylactic shock, the most severe manifestation of anaphylaxis, remains unknown. Risk factors and biomarkers have not been fully identified. Objective: To identify risk factors in patients who experience anaphylactic shock.

METHODS

Using lipid transfer protein (LTP) allergy as a model, we compared the characteristics of patients who developed anaphylaxis and anaphylactic shock. We recorded demographics, pollen sensitization, foods ingested up to 2 hours before onset of the reaction, and the presence of cofactors. Culprit foods were identified through a compatible clinical history and positive allergology work-up (skin prick test and/or sIgE).

RESULTS

We evaluated 150 reactions in 55 patients with anaphylaxis (134 reactions) and 12 with anaphylactic shock (16 reactions). Patients in the anaphylaxis group experienced twice as many reactions (mean [SD], 2.4 [2.5] for anaphylaxis vs 1.3 [1.5] for anaphylactic shock; P<.02). No relationship was found between any food group and severity of the reaction. The most frequent food involved in both groups of patients was the combination of several plant-derived foods (plant food mix), followed by peach and nuts. Indeed, in the reactions caused by plant food mix, the presence of a cofactor was observed more often than in other food groups. On the other hand, cofactors were not present in peach- and nut-related reactions. Exercise was the most frequent cofactor in all groups.

CONCLUSION

In our series, the severity of the reactions was not determined by the kind of food or presence of a cofactor. Anaphylactic shock seems to be an infrequent presentation that may be associated with other individual-related factors requiring further evaluation.

摘要

背景与目的

速发型过敏反应中最严重的表现——过敏性休克的流行情况尚不清楚。风险因素和生物标志物尚未完全确定。目的:确定发生过敏性休克患者的风险因素。

方法

使用脂质转移蛋白(LTP)过敏作为模型,比较发生过敏反应和过敏性休克患者的特征。我们记录了人口统计学数据、花粉致敏情况、发病前 2 小时内摄入的食物以及是否存在协同因素。通过与临床病史相符和过敏症检查(皮肤点刺试验和/或 sIgE)阳性确定致敏食物。

结果

我们评估了 55 名过敏患者(134 次反应)和 12 名过敏性休克患者(16 次反应)的 150 次反应。过敏组患者经历的反应次数是过敏性休克组的两倍(平均[标准差],过敏组为 2.4[2.5],过敏性休克组为 1.3[1.5];P<.02)。没有发现任何食物组与反应严重程度之间存在关系。两组患者中最常见的食物均为几种植物源性食物(植物食物混合),其次是桃和坚果。实际上,在由植物食物混合引起的反应中,比在其他食物组中更常观察到协同因素的存在。另一方面,在桃和坚果相关反应中不存在协同因素。运动是所有组中最常见的协同因素。

结论

在我们的系列研究中,反应的严重程度与食物种类或协同因素无关。过敏性休克似乎是一种不常见的表现,可能与其他个体相关因素有关,需要进一步评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验