FAllergy Section, Pneumology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
IRCE - Institut d´Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2022 Jul 22;32(4):282-290. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0698. Epub 2021 May 4.
The prevalence of anaphylactic shock, the most severe manifestation of anaphylaxis, remains unknown. Risk factors and biomarkers have not been fully identified. Objective: To identify risk factors in patients who experience anaphylactic shock.
Using lipid transfer protein (LTP) allergy as a model, we compared the characteristics of patients who developed anaphylaxis and anaphylactic shock. We recorded demographics, pollen sensitization, foods ingested up to 2 hours before onset of the reaction, and the presence of cofactors. Culprit foods were identified through a compatible clinical history and positive allergology work-up (skin prick test and/or sIgE).
We evaluated 150 reactions in 55 patients with anaphylaxis (134 reactions) and 12 with anaphylactic shock (16 reactions). Patients in the anaphylaxis group experienced twice as many reactions (mean [SD], 2.4 [2.5] for anaphylaxis vs 1.3 [1.5] for anaphylactic shock; P<.02). No relationship was found between any food group and severity of the reaction. The most frequent food involved in both groups of patients was the combination of several plant-derived foods (plant food mix), followed by peach and nuts. Indeed, in the reactions caused by plant food mix, the presence of a cofactor was observed more often than in other food groups. On the other hand, cofactors were not present in peach- and nut-related reactions. Exercise was the most frequent cofactor in all groups.
In our series, the severity of the reactions was not determined by the kind of food or presence of a cofactor. Anaphylactic shock seems to be an infrequent presentation that may be associated with other individual-related factors requiring further evaluation.
速发型过敏反应中最严重的表现——过敏性休克的流行情况尚不清楚。风险因素和生物标志物尚未完全确定。目的:确定发生过敏性休克患者的风险因素。
使用脂质转移蛋白(LTP)过敏作为模型,比较发生过敏反应和过敏性休克患者的特征。我们记录了人口统计学数据、花粉致敏情况、发病前 2 小时内摄入的食物以及是否存在协同因素。通过与临床病史相符和过敏症检查(皮肤点刺试验和/或 sIgE)阳性确定致敏食物。
我们评估了 55 名过敏患者(134 次反应)和 12 名过敏性休克患者(16 次反应)的 150 次反应。过敏组患者经历的反应次数是过敏性休克组的两倍(平均[标准差],过敏组为 2.4[2.5],过敏性休克组为 1.3[1.5];P<.02)。没有发现任何食物组与反应严重程度之间存在关系。两组患者中最常见的食物均为几种植物源性食物(植物食物混合),其次是桃和坚果。实际上,在由植物食物混合引起的反应中,比在其他食物组中更常观察到协同因素的存在。另一方面,在桃和坚果相关反应中不存在协同因素。运动是所有组中最常见的协同因素。
在我们的系列研究中,反应的严重程度与食物种类或协同因素无关。过敏性休克似乎是一种不常见的表现,可能与其他个体相关因素有关,需要进一步评估。