• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉静脉旁路移植术后再狭窄的血管内治疗:一例临床病例报告。

Endovascular treatment for restenosis of carotid venous bypass graft: a clinical case report.

机构信息

Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.

Interventional Neuroradiology, Emergency Care Department, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Biomed. 2021 Apr 30;92(S1):e2021149. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS1.9811.

DOI:10.23750/abm.v92iS1.9811
PMID:33944833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8142786/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Restenosis after open carotid surgery (OCS) represents an issue that experts are very often facing nowadays, both after carotid endoarterectomy(CEA) and carotid bypass(CB). Yet, even if from one side carotid artery stenting (CAS) is currently recommended by most guidelines as treatment of choice for carotid restenosis after CEA, on the other side little is known regarding the best treatment of restenosis after CB. This clinical case report is aimed to empathize the endovascular treatment as an effective therapeutic option for restenosis after OCS.

METHODS

A 75-year-old woman with severe comorbidities was admitted to our Unit for left carotid bypass graft restenosis. One year earlier, the patient had been treated with left carotid bypass grafting in saphenous vein for infectious complications occurred after CEA for symptomatic left carotid stenosis. The patient underwent a carotid Duplex ultrasonography scan (DUS) which showed a hemodynamically significant left carotid venous graft stenosis with peak systolic velocity of 315 cm/sec; in order to assess the grade of the stenosis a computed tomography angiography confirmed the presence of a significant narrowing of left carotid graft. A carotid artery angiography was performed after 20days, reconfirming the presence of a significant left carotid graft stenosis and was successfully treated with 7x40mm self-expanding stent.

RESULTS

The patient had an uneventful post-procedural course and was discharged the day after. After six months, the patient underwent a carotid DUS in our outpatient clinic which confirmed the overall graft and stent patency.

CONCLUSION

CAS represents a feasible therapeutic option for carotid restenosis in patients treated after CB. This clinical case demonstrates that CAS can be performed with acceptable risks and good early results.

摘要

背景与目的

开放颈动脉手术(OCS)后的再狭窄是当今专家经常面临的问题,无论是颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后还是颈动脉旁路术(CB)后。然而,尽管目前大多数指南都推荐颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)作为 CEA 后颈动脉再狭窄的首选治疗方法,但对于 CB 后再狭窄的最佳治疗方法知之甚少。本临床病例报告旨在强调血管内治疗作为 OCS 后再狭窄的有效治疗选择。

方法

一名 75 岁的女性患者合并严重合并症,因左侧颈动脉旁路移植再狭窄入住我院。一年前,该患者因 CEA 后发生感染性并发症而行左侧颈动脉旁路移植术治疗,在左侧颈动脉旁路移植术中使用大隐静脉。患者接受了颈动脉双功能超声检查(DUS),显示左侧颈动脉静脉移植吻合口狭窄,收缩期峰值速度为 315cm/sec,具有血流动力学意义;为了评估狭窄程度,计算机断层血管造影术(CTA)证实左侧颈动脉旁路移植存在明显狭窄。20 天后进行了颈动脉血管造影术,再次证实左侧颈动脉旁路移植吻合口狭窄,成功置入 7x40mm 自膨式支架。

结果

患者术后无并发症,次日出院。术后 6 个月,患者在我院门诊进行了颈动脉 DUS 检查,证实了整体旁路和支架通畅。

结论

CAS 是 CB 后治疗的颈动脉再狭窄患者可行的治疗选择。本临床病例表明,CAS 可以在可接受的风险和良好的早期结果下进行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0abf/8142786/ef51be37bcb3/ACTA-92-149-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0abf/8142786/296ebc6e16bb/ACTA-92-149-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0abf/8142786/57bce37d756a/ACTA-92-149-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0abf/8142786/ef51be37bcb3/ACTA-92-149-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0abf/8142786/296ebc6e16bb/ACTA-92-149-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0abf/8142786/57bce37d756a/ACTA-92-149-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0abf/8142786/ef51be37bcb3/ACTA-92-149-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Endovascular treatment for restenosis of carotid venous bypass graft: a clinical case report.颈动脉静脉旁路移植术后再狭窄的血管内治疗:一例临床病例报告。
Acta Biomed. 2021 Apr 30;92(S1):e2021149. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS1.9811.
2
Carotid bypass: a safe and durable solution for recurrent carotid stenosis.颈动脉搭桥术:复发性颈动脉狭窄的一种安全且持久的解决方案。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Jul;28(5):1329-34. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.12.031. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
3
Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.支架置入后颈动脉的双功超声速度标准。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan;47(1):63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.038.
4
Duplex scan surveillance after carotid angioplasty and stenting: a rational definition of stent stenosis.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术后的双功超声监测:支架狭窄的合理定义
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Sep;46(3):460-5; discussion 465-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.04.073. Epub 2007 Jul 30.
5
Management of in-sent restenosis after carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.高危患者颈动脉支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的管理。
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.040.
6
Predictive Value of Quantitative Duplex Ultrasound Analysis for In-stent Carotid Artery Restenosis.定量双功超声分析对颈动脉支架内再狭窄的预测价值
Altern Ther Health Med. 2023 Jan;29(1):52-57.
7
Carotid duplex velocity criteria revisited for the diagnosis of carotid in-stent restenosis.重新审视用于诊断颈动脉支架内再狭窄的颈动脉双功超声速度标准。
Vascular. 2007 May-Jun;15(3):119-25. doi: 10.2310/6670.2007.00030.
8
Long-term Comparative Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting Following Previous Carotid Endarterectomy vs De Novo Lesions.既往颈动脉内膜切除术与新发病变后颈动脉支架置入术的长期比较结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Jun;22(3):449-56. doi: 10.1177/1526602815581597. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
9
Ultrasound surveillance after CAS and CEA: what's the evidence?颈动脉支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术术后的超声监测:证据有哪些?
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2014 Apr;55(2 Suppl 1):33-41.
10
Optimal carotid duplex velocity criteria for defining the severity of carotid in-stent restenosis.用于定义颈动脉支架内再狭窄严重程度的最佳颈动脉双功超声速度标准。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Sep;48(3):589-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.04.004. Epub 2008 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Editor's Choice - Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS).编辑推荐——动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉和椎动脉疾病的管理:欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)2017年临床实践指南
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jan;55(1):3-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
2
Prosthetic bypass for restenosis after endarterectomy or stenting of the carotid artery.颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术后再狭窄的人工血管搭桥术。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jun;65(6):1664-1672. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.046. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
3
Management of prosthetic patch infection after CEA.
颈动脉内膜切除术后人工补片感染的处理
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2016 Apr;57(2):137-44. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
4
Repeated carotid endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting for patients with carotid restenosis after carotid endarterectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.颈动脉内膜切除术后颈动脉再狭窄患者的重复颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术:系统评价和荟萃分析
Surgery. 2015 Jun;157(6):1166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
5
Stenting versus endarterectomy for restenosis following prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy: an individual patient data meta-analysis.支架置入与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗同侧颈动脉内膜切除术后再狭窄:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2015 Mar;261(3):598-604. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000799.
6
Multicentric retrospective study of endovascular treatment for restenosis after open carotid surgery.多中心回顾性研究:开放颈动脉手术后再狭窄的血管内治疗。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Dec;42(6):742-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
7
Prosthetic carotid bypass grafts for atherosclerotic lesions: a prospective study of 198 consecutive cases.用于治疗动脉粥样硬化病变的人工颈动脉搭桥移植物:198例连续病例的前瞻性研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009 Mar;37(3):272-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.11.012. Epub 2008 Dec 25.
8
What should we do with asymptomatic carotid stenosis?对于无症状性颈动脉狭窄我们该如何应对?
Int J Stroke. 2007 Feb;2(1):27-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2007.00096.x.
9
Recurrent carotid stenosis after CEA and CAS: diagnosis and management.颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉血管成形术及支架置入术后复发性颈动脉狭窄:诊断与处理
Semin Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec;20(4):259-66. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2007.10.009.
10
Carotid bypass with polytetrafluoroethylene grafts: a study of 110 consecutive patients.聚四氟乙烯移植物行颈动脉旁路术:对110例连续患者的研究。
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Nov;38(5):1031-7; discussion 1038. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00708-0.