Department of Orthopaedics of Herz Jesu Krankenhaus Vienna, Baumgasse 20A, 1030 Wien, Austria; Johannes Kepler University Linz, Medical Faculty, Altenbergerstraße 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.
Johannes Kepler University Linz, Medical Faculty, Altenbergerstraße 69, 4040 Linz, Austria; maz - Microsurgical Training and Research Center, Industriezeile 36/7, 4020 Linz, Austria.
Foot (Edinb). 2021 Jun;47:101779. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2021.101779. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
Chevron osteotomy with consecutive fixation is a commonly performed operative treatment option for hallux valgus deformities. The present retrospective study aims to compare the clinical and radiological outcome of novel bioabsorbable magnesium screw fixation with metal screw and Kirschner wire fixation. Eighteen matched triplets were assembled according to the following criteria: female gender, age difference less than 5 years, date of operation within 4 months, difference in preoperative intermetatarsal angle less than 5°, and equal experience of the first and second surgeon. These patients, between 18 and 85 years of age and with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months, were invited to a follow-up examination, of which only 16 matched triplets of patients entirely kept the appointment. Thus, 48 feet of 44 patients were clinically evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society scale, Foot Function Index, University of California and Los Angeles Activity Score, as well as a visual analogue scale for pain, satisfaction, cosmetic results, and functional impairment. Radiographical assessment included measuring intermetatarsal angle and first metatarsophalangeal angles. All occurring complications and revision surgeries were noted. Significant differences were observed for postoperative intermetatarsal angle between magnesium screw and pin fixation (p = 0.009). Moreover, patients receiving magnesium screw were significantly more prone to undergo the same procedure again (p = 0.03). In conclusion, if the advantages of bioabsorbable magnesium screws outweigh the drawbacks of increased costs and a higher surgical demand, this implant might serve as possible chevron osteotomy fixation method. Compression screws and Kirschner wires also show comparable satisfactory outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III retrospective comparative study.
克氏针与可吸收镁钉固定的 Chevron 截骨术是治疗拇外翻畸形的常用手术治疗方法。本回顾性研究旨在比较新型可吸收镁钉固定与金属螺钉和克氏针固定的临床和影像学结果。根据以下标准,将 18 对配对的三联体患者进行了分组:女性,年龄差异小于 5 岁,手术时间在 4 个月内,术前跖骨间角差异小于 5°,且第一和第二手术医生的经验相同。这些年龄在 18 至 85 岁之间,随访时间至少 12 个月的患者被邀请进行随访检查,但只有 16 对配对的三联体患者完全接受了预约。因此,对 44 名患者的 48 只脚进行了临床评估,使用美国矫形足踝协会量表、足部功能指数、加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶活动评分以及疼痛、满意度、美容效果和功能障碍的视觉模拟量表。影像学评估包括测量跖骨间角和第一跖骨间关节角。记录所有发生的并发症和翻修手术。镁钉和钢针固定术后跖骨间角有显著差异(p = 0.009)。此外,接受镁钉固定的患者再次接受相同手术的可能性明显更高(p = 0.03)。结论:如果可吸收镁钉的优势超过增加的成本和更高的手术需求的劣势,这种植入物可能成为 Chevron 截骨术的可行固定方法。加压螺钉和克氏针也显示出类似的满意结果。证据水平:III 级回顾性比较研究。