Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助胃上部胃癌小残胃全胃切除术。

Robotic Subtotal Gastrectomy with Small Remnant Stomach for Gastric Cancer in the Upper Stomach.

机构信息

Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Aug;25(8):2165-2171. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05025-x. Epub 2021 May 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic subtotal gastrectomy (RsTG) with a small remnant stomach for treatment of gastric cancer (GC) in the upper stomach may have advantages over robotic TG (RTG). These may affect postoperative complications and postoperative nutritional status.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective study of 46 consecutive patients with GC who underwent RsTG (n = 10) and RTG (n = 36). The indication for RsTG included tumor located in the upper body of the stomach, in which the distance between the upper edge of the tumor and the junction was 2 cm or more and less than 5 cm, and no clinical evidence of lymph node metastasis.

RESULTS

Operation time was significantly longer (384 min) and intraoperative blood loss was significantly larger (38 ml) in the RTG group than in the RsTG group (299.5 min, P = 0.021, and 25 ml P = 0.002). Two patients (5.6%) in the RTG group had complications, while no postoperative complications of higher than grade II were observed in the RsTG group. Serum albumin levels at 3 months after surgery were significantly higher in the RsTG group (3.85 g/dl) than in the RTG group (3.2 g/dl, P = 0.001). Postoperative recovery of bodyweight at 6 months after surgery was significantly better in the RsTG group (91.3%) than in the RTG group (84.25%, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

RsTG for treatment of patients with GC in the upper body of the stomach is safe and feasible, and may enable improved postoperative nutritional status compared with RTG.

摘要

背景

机器人辅助胃大部切除术(RsTG)保留小残胃治疗胃上部癌(GC)可能优于机器人全胃切除术(RTG)。这可能会影响术后并发症和术后营养状况。

方法

这是一项单中心回顾性研究,纳入 46 例接受 RsTG(n=10)和 RTG(n=36)治疗的 GC 连续患者。RsTG 的适应证包括肿瘤位于胃上部,肿瘤上缘与胃食管结合部的距离≥2cm 且<5cm,且无临床证据表明存在淋巴结转移。

结果

RTG 组的手术时间明显较长(384min),术中出血量明显较多(38ml)(299.5min,P=0.021;25ml,P=0.002)。RTG 组有 2 例(5.6%)患者发生并发症,而 RsTG 组无 II 级以上术后并发症。RsTG 组术后 3 个月血清白蛋白水平明显高于 RTG 组(3.85g/dl 比 3.2g/dl,P=0.001)。RsTG 组术后 6 个月体重恢复情况明显好于 RTG 组(91.3%比 84.25%,P=0.001)。

结论

机器人辅助胃大部切除术治疗胃上部癌安全可行,与 RTG 相比,可能改善术后营养状况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验