Jia Zhuoyu, Cao Shougen, Meng Cheng, Liu Xiaodong, Li Zequn, Tian Yulong, Yu Junjian, Sun Yuqi, Xu Jianfei, Liu Gan, Zhang Xingqi, Yang Hao, Zhong Hao, Wang Qingrui, Zhou Yanbing
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor Basic and Translational Medicine, Qingdao, China.
Cancer Med. 2023 May;12(9):10485-10498. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5785. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
Studies on robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) are currently limited. This study aimed to compare the intraoperative performance as well as short- and long-term outcomes of RTG and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG).
A total of 969 patients underwent robotic (n = 161) or laparoscopic (n = 636) total gastrectomy between October 2014 and October 2021. The two groups of patients were matched 1:3 using the propensity score matching (PSM) method. The intraoperative performance as well as short- and long-term outcomes of the robotic (n = 147) and the laparoscopic (n = 371) groups were compared.
After matching, the estimated intraoperative blood loss was lower (80.51 ± 68.77 vs. 89.89 ± 66.12, p = 0.008), and the total number of lymph node dissections was higher (34.74 ± 12.44 vs. 29.83 ± 12.22, p < 0.001) in the RTG group compared with the LTG group. More lymph node dissections at the upper edge of the pancreas were performed in the RTG group than in the LTG (12.59 ± 4.18 vs. 10.33 ± 4.58, p = 0.001). Additionally, postoperative recovery indicators and laboratory data were greater in the RTG group than those in the LTG group, while postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups (19.0% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.962). For overweight or obese patients with body mass indexes (BMIs) ≥25, certain clinical outcomes of the RTG remained advantageous, and no significant differences in three-year overall survival (OS) or relapse-free survival (RFS) were observed.
Robotic total gastrectomy demonstrated better intraoperative performance, could improve the short-term clinical outcomes of patients, and was more conducive to patient recovery. However, the long-term efficacies of the two approaches were similar. Robotic surgical systems may reduce surgical stress responses in patients, allowing them to receive postoperative chemotherapy sooner.
目前关于机器人全胃切除术(RTG)的研究有限。本研究旨在比较RTG与腹腔镜全胃切除术(LTG)的术中表现以及短期和长期结局。
2014年10月至2021年10月期间,共有969例患者接受了机器人手术(n = 161)或腹腔镜手术(n = 636)全胃切除术。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)方法将两组患者按1:3进行匹配。比较机器人手术组(n = 147)和腹腔镜手术组(n = 371)的术中表现以及短期和长期结局。
匹配后,RTG组估计术中失血量低于LTG组(80.51±68.77 vs. 89.89±66.12,p = 0.008),且淋巴结清扫总数高于LTG组(34.74±12.44 vs. 29.83±12.22,p < 0.001)。RTG组在胰腺上缘进行的淋巴结清扫比LTG组更多(12.59±4.18 vs. 10.33±4.58,p = 0.001)。此外,RTG组术后恢复指标和实验室数据优于LTG组,而两组术后并发症相当(19.0% vs. 18.9%,p = 0.962)。对于体重指数(BMI)≥25的超重或肥胖患者,RTG的某些临床结局仍然具有优势,且三年总生存率(OS)或无复发生存率(RFS)无显著差异。
机器人全胃切除术显示出更好的术中表现,可改善患者的短期临床结局,更有利于患者恢复。然而,两种手术方式的长期疗效相似。机器人手术系统可能会减轻患者的手术应激反应,使其能够更早接受术后化疗。