Suppr超能文献

流式细胞术 CLL 评分的一致性。

Concordance between flow cytometry CLL scores.

机构信息

Hematology Laboratory, ICO-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol. Functional Cytomics- IJC, LUMN, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Lab Hematol. 2021 Aug;43(4):743-751. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13567. Epub 2021 May 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Multiple flow cytometry scores/diagnostic systems for the classification of leukemic lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD) have been published but few have been compared between them.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We classified a cohort of leukemic LPD based on eleven published flow cytometry scores/diagnostic systems and compared their classification as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or non-CLL LPD.

RESULTS

329 patients were included. Patients classified as CLL ranged from 46% to 73%, depending on the score/diagnostic system used. All eleven scores/diagnostic systems agreed in 184/324 (57%) of patients while in 58/324 (18%) at least two scores/diagnostic systems classified the patient differently (from the majority). Fleiss kappa was 0.74, but pairwise agreement was variable (Cohen's kappa: 0.48 to 0.87).

CONCLUSION

This study found a suboptimal agreement between published flow cytometry scores/diagnostic systems for the classification of LPD.

摘要

简介

已有多个流式细胞术评分/诊断系统用于白血病性淋巴增殖性疾病(LPD)的分类,但它们之间很少进行比较。

患者与方法

我们根据十一种已发表的流式细胞术评分/诊断系统对白血病性 LPD 进行分类,并比较了它们作为慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)或非 CLL LPD 的分类。

结果

共纳入 329 例患者。根据评分/诊断系统的不同,CLL 患者的比例范围为 46%至 73%。11 种评分/诊断系统在 324 例患者中的 184 例(57%)中一致,而在 324 例患者中的 58 例(18%)中至少两种评分/诊断系统将患者分类为不同的疾病(与多数情况不一致)。Fleiss kappa 值为 0.74,但两两之间的一致性存在差异(Cohen's kappa:0.48 至 0.87)。

结论

本研究发现,已发表的用于 LPD 分类的流式细胞术评分/诊断系统之间的一致性较差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验