University of Minnesota Duluth,
Loyola University Chicago.
Politics Life Sci. 2021 May;40(1):72-82. doi: 10.1017/pls.2020.30.
Virtually all studies of policy diffusion are based on statutory enactments by state legislatures. But a substantial number of medicalized marijuana laws were initiated through citizen initiatives and ratified by referenda (I&R). This case study suggests that the diffusion of laws adopted by I&R requires two modifications to the conventional model of policy diffusion. First, early policy adoptions must occur through direct democracy so that horizontal diffusion results when those past adoptions by the I&R process lead to future adoptions. Second, the necessity of bypassing institutions of representative government must be operationalized as an interaction between the availability of direct democracy and the precise political variable that blocks legislative enactments.
几乎所有关于政策扩散的研究都基于州立法机构的法定法规。但是,大量的医用大麻法规是通过公民倡议发起并经公投(I&R)批准的。这个案例研究表明,I&R 通过的法律的扩散需要对传统的政策扩散模型进行两项修改。首先,早期的政策采用必须通过直接民主进行,以便当 I&R 过程中的过去采用导致未来采用时,会产生水平扩散。其次,必须将绕过代议制政府机构的必要性作为直接民主的可用性与阻止立法法规的精确政治变量之间的相互作用来实施。