University of Phayao, School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics (Phayao, Thailand).
Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics (Richmond/VA, USA).
Dental Press J Orthod. 2021 Apr 30;26(2):e2119378. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.26.2.e2119378.oar. eCollection 2021.
To determine whether separating the alignment and leveling phases can reduce proclination of the mandibular incisors.
Eligibility criteria included Class I subjects with an irregularity index of 3-5 mm, 3-4 mm curve-of-Spee (COS), and non-extraction treatment. Thirty adults were randomly allocated into two groups: (1) Control group was leveled and aligned simultaneously with flat archwires progressively to 0.016x0.022-in stainless-steel; (2) Experimental group was aligned first with 0.014-in-superelastic NiTi with mild accentuated COS, then leveled using 0.016x0.022-in beta-titanium accentuated COS archwires and gradually reduced the curve until flat. Mandibular incisor position and inclination were evaluated by cephalometric analysis. COS and irregularity index were evaluated in study models. Assessment was conducted twice after 0.016-in NiTi and after 0.016x0.022-in stainless-steel archwire placements. Dental changes from cephalograms and models were compared within group using paired t-test and between groups using independent t-test.
Control group: Round-wire-phase, mandibular incisors tipped labially (4.38° and 1 mm) with intrusion (-1.13 mm); Rectangular-wire-phase, mandibular incisors further intruded and proclined (-0.63 mm and 1.38°). Experimental group: During aligning with round accentuated COS archwires, mandibular incisors tipped very slightly labially (0.75° and 0.50 mm) with no significant intrusion; during leveling with rectangular archwires, incisors majorly intruded (1.75 mm) with slight proclination (1.81°). The experimental group had significant less incisor proclination (control: 5.76°, experimental: 2.56°) with more incisor intrusion (control: -1.75 mm, experimental: -2.13 mm). The COS in experimental group showed significant greater reduction (-2.88 mm) than that of the control group (-1.69 mm).
In control group, mandibular incisor proclination was markedly observed in round archwires, with further proclination caused by rectangular archwires. In experimental group, minimal proclination was exhibited when accentuated COS round archwires were used for aligning. Leveling with rectangular archwires caused less proclination with more COS reduction.
探讨分阶段排齐整平是否可以减少下颌切牙唇倾。
纳入标准为安氏 I 类错牙合、不规则指数为 3-5mm、3-4mm 补偿曲线(COS)、非拔牙矫治。30 名成人患者随机分为两组:(1)对照组,使用 0.016x0.022 英寸不锈钢方丝由轻至重度弯制的平直弓丝,分阶段同时排齐整平;(2)实验组,先用 0.014 英寸超弹镍钛丝弯制轻至中度补偿曲线,排齐后用 0.016x0.022 英寸β钛丝弯制中度补偿曲线,逐渐减少 COS,直至平直。通过头影测量分析评估下颌切牙位置和倾斜度,在模型上评估 COS 和不规则指数。在 0.016 英寸镍钛丝和 0.016x0.022 英寸不锈钢丝弓丝放置后两次进行评估。使用配对 t 检验比较组内、独立 t 检验比较组间牙颌变化。
对照组:圆丝阶段,下颌切牙唇倾(4.38°和 1mm)并内收(-1.13mm);方丝阶段,下颌切牙进一步内收并唇倾(-0.63mm 和 1.38°)。实验组:用圆补偿曲度超弹镍钛丝排齐时,下颌切牙唇倾很小(0.75°和 0.50mm),无明显内收;用方丝整平时,切牙大量内收(1.75mm),并轻度唇倾(1.81°)。实验组切牙唇倾程度显著小于对照组(对照组:5.76°,实验组:2.56°),内收程度显著大于对照组(对照组:-1.75mm,实验组:-2.13mm)。实验组的 COS 显著减少(-2.88mm),对照组减少(-1.69mm)。
对照组中,下颌切牙在圆丝阶段明显唇倾,方丝阶段进一步唇倾。实验组用补偿曲度超弹镍钛丝排齐时,切牙唇倾很小。用方丝整平时,切牙唇倾程度更小,COS 减少更多。