• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对比唇腭裂患者生长发育期和非生长发育期上颌骨骨段运用外牵引技术后长期骨骼稳定性:系统回顾和荟萃分析

Comparison of long-term skeletal stability following maxillary advancement using rigid external distraction in growing and non-growing patients with cleft lip and palate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India.

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2022 Jan 25;44(1):22-29. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjab017.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjab017
PMID:33950171
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the long-term skeletal stability following maxillary advancement using Rigid External Distraction (RED) in growing and non-growing patients with Cleft Lip and Palate (CLP).

METHODS

Data sources: A systematic literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines from database inception till August 2020 in MEDLINE-PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Science Direct, Google Scholar and a manual search in the institutional library. Study eligibility criteria, participants and intervention: All available literature published in English, with a minimum of six human subjects with well-defined age range either 7-14.9 years or 15-30 years, follow up period of a minimum of 12 months assessing the skeletal stability as horizontal change at Point A (Subspinale) following maxillary advancement using a RED device, without the use of rigid internal fixation or bone grafts were included in the study. Study appraisal and synthesis method: The quality assessment of selected articles was done using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The meta-analysis was carried out with Q statistic method, I-squared statistics, fixed-effect model to estimate pooled mean and Begg-Mazumdar bias indicator.

RESULTS

Selected nine articles that were qualitatively assessed for relapse rate following maxillary advancement using a RED device, showed consistent and stable results. The meta-analysis found no significant difference in long-term skeletal stability of maxillary advancement by RED device in growing and non-growing patients with CLP [(growing group: Pooled proportion = 0.2927; 95% CI = 0.1534 to 0.4319) (non-growing group: Pooled proportion = 0.23077; 95% CI = 0.09854 to 0.36300)].

LIMITATIONS

No study, as revealed by the search, was available that compared the two groups as defined by the inclusion criteria. Data for the two groups were retrieved from different studies and meta-analysed.

CONCLUSION

RED is an effective modality for correction of maxillary hypoplasia secondary to CLP, requiring large maxillary advancement. The technique can be used in young and adult patients with similar long-term results.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020205513.

摘要

目的

比较使用刚性外牵引(RED)治疗唇腭裂(CLP)患者生长中和非生长中上颌骨前突的长期骨骼稳定性。

方法

数据来源:根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目,从数据库开始到 2020 年 8 月,在 MEDLINE-PubMed、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册中心(CENTRAL)、Science Direct、Google Scholar 进行了系统文献检索,并在机构图书馆进行了手动检索。研究合格标准、参与者和干预措施:所有可用的文献均以英语发表,参与者至少有 6 人,年龄范围明确为 7-14.9 岁或 15-30 岁,随访时间至少为 12 个月,评估上颌骨前突后骨骼稳定性,使用 RED 装置,不使用刚性内固定或骨移植。研究评估和综合方法:使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对选定文章的质量进行评估。使用 Q 统计量法、I-平方统计量、固定效应模型对 Meta 分析进行了评估,以估计汇总平均值和 Begg-Mazumdar 偏倚指标。

结果

选择了 9 篇定性评估使用 RED 装置治疗上颌骨前突后复发率的文章,结果一致且稳定。Meta 分析发现,在生长中和非生长的 CLP 患者中,使用 RED 装置进行上颌骨前突的长期骨骼稳定性无显著差异[(生长组:汇总比例=0.2927;95%置信区间=0.1534 至 0.4319)(非生长组:汇总比例=0.23077;95%置信区间=0.09854 至 0.36300)]。

局限性

没有研究如搜索结果所示,可将两组按纳入标准进行比较。两组的数据来自不同的研究并进行了荟萃分析。

结论

RED 是治疗 CLP 继发上颌骨发育不全的有效方法,需要进行较大的上颌骨前突。该技术可用于年轻和成年患者,长期效果相似。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020205513。

相似文献

1
Comparison of long-term skeletal stability following maxillary advancement using rigid external distraction in growing and non-growing patients with cleft lip and palate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.对比唇腭裂患者生长发育期和非生长发育期上颌骨骨段运用外牵引技术后长期骨骼稳定性:系统回顾和荟萃分析
Eur J Orthod. 2022 Jan 25;44(1):22-29. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjab017.
2
Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients.唇腭裂患者的上颌骨牵张成骨术与正颌外科手术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 10;8(8):CD010403. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010403.pub3.
3
Long-term follow-up of large maxillary advancements with distraction osteogenesis in growing and non-growing cleft lip and palate patients.生长发育期和非生长发育期唇腭裂患者采用牵张成骨技术进行大型上颌骨前移的长期随访
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 Jan;68(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.08.069. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
4
Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities.使用坚固外部牵张装置对上颌骨裂畸形进行牵张成骨术后的长期骨骼稳定性。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Nov;114(6):1382-92; discussion 1393-4. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000138593.89303.1b.
5
Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate cases with midface hypoplasia using rigid external distractor: an alternative technique.使用坚固外部牵张器对唇腭裂伴面中部发育不全病例进行上颌骨牵张成骨:一种替代技术。
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 May;25(3):746-51. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000735.
6
Long-term results of maxillary distraction osteogenesis in nongrowing cleft: 5-years experience using internal device.非生长型腭裂患者上颌骨牵引成骨的长期效果:使用内置装置的5年经验
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2016;117(12):685-690. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2016_134.
7
Maxillary advancement with conventional orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate: is it a stable technique?唇腭裂患者采用传统正颌外科手术进行上颌前徙:这是一种稳定的技术吗?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;70(12):2859-66. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
8
Relapse rate after surgical treatment of maxillary hypoplasia in non-growing cleft patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非生长型腭裂患者上颌骨发育不全术后复发率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Apr;49(4):421-431. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.08.012. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
9
Rigid External Le Fort I Distraction Followed by Secondary Bone Grafting for Maxillary Advancements in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.唇腭裂患者上颌前突的坚固外Le Fort I型牵引成骨联合二期植骨术
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Oct;30(7):1974-1978. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005620.
10
Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients.唇腭裂患者的上颌骨牵张成骨术与正颌手术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 30;9(9):CD010403. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010403.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of the maxillary anterior segmental distraction osteogenesis in patients with cleft lip and palate.上颌前段骨切开术在唇腭裂患者中的疗效。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 19;24(1):1409. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05208-3.
2
Evidence Mapping and Quality Analysis of Systematic Reviews on Various Aspects Related to Cleft Lip and Palate.唇腭裂相关各方面系统评价的证据图谱与质量分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 16;12(18):6002. doi: 10.3390/jcm12186002.