Suppr超能文献

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered cefoperazone and sulbactam when given in combination to infected, seriously ill, elderly patients.

作者信息

Schwartz J I, Jauregui L E, Bachmann K A, Martin M E, Reitberg D P

机构信息

St. Vincent Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio 43608.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 May;32(5):730-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.5.730.

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone and sulbactam in combination were evaluated in six, elderly, seriously ill patients treated with the drug combination for intra-abdominal infections. After giving informed consent, three males and three females aged 63.5 to 77.5 (mean 67.9) years and weighing 54.5 to 86.8 (mean, 67.6) kg were treated with cefoperazone (2.0 g) and sulbactam (1.0 g) infused intravenously every 12 h for at least 5 days. Cefoperazone and sulbactam pharmacokinetics were characterized on both days 1 and 5 of treatment. Eleven serial blood samples were obtained just prior to and following dose 1 on days 1 and 5 of treatment. Mean estimates of cefoperazone maximal concentration in plasma (Cmax), area under the curve of drug concentration in plasma versus time (AUC), half-life (t 1/2), apparent volume of distribution by the area method (Varea), apparent volume of distribution at steady state (Vss), and total body clearance (CL) for day 1 (day 5) were 297.5 237.5) micrograms/ml, 1,247 (1,063) micrograms.h/ml, 7.0 (4.9) h, 16.1 (13.4) liter, 13.1 (14.4) liter, and 28.9 (34.2) ml/min, respectively. Day 1 (day 5) mean values for sulbactam Cmax, AUC, t 1/2, Varea, Vss, and CL were 110.3 (78.0) micrograms/ml, 228 (217) micrograms.h/ml, 3.4 (2.5) h, 26.1 (18.5) liter, 18.9 (15.4) liter, and 97 (94) ml/min, respectively. Both drugs evidenced slower elimination and greater pharmacokinetic variability in these patients compared with values previously reported for normal volunteers. As patients improved during the course of therapy, the only pharmacokinetic parameter significantly changed between days 1 and 5 was a shortened sulbactam t 1/2. Our inability to find substantial evidence of pharmacokinetic normalization may have been related to sample size and study duration. Both drugs were present in potentially therapeutic concentrations for the entire 12-h dosing interval, but without undue accumulation from days 1 to 5.

摘要

相似文献

3
Steady-state pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone and sulbactam in patients with acute appendicitis.
Ann Pharmacother. 1994 Jun;28(6):703-7. doi: 10.1177/106002809402800602.
9
Pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone and sulbactam in liver transplant patients.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Jun;42(6):644-50. doi: 10.1177/00970002042006006.

本文引用的文献

1
Third generation cephalosporins.第三代头孢菌素
Med Clin North Am. 1982 Jan;66(1):283-91. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)31460-2.
2
Computation of model-independent pharmacokinetic parameters during multiple dosing.
J Pharm Sci. 1984 Apr;73(4):570-1. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600730436.
5
Pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone: a review.
Drugs. 1981;22 Suppl 1:35-45. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198100221-00010.
10
Effect of protein binding on cefmenoxime steady-state kinetics in critical patients.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1984 Jan;35(1):64-73. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1984.10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验