Suppr超能文献

变应性鼻炎患者鼻一氧化氮检测:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Nasal nitric oxide testing for allergic rhinitis patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Immun Inflamm Dis. 2021 Sep;9(3):635-648. doi: 10.1002/iid3.439. Epub 2021 May 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) levels in allergic rhinitis (AR), healthy people or nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) have shown contradicting results in previous studies. By meta-analysis, we reviewed studies that measured nNO in AR patients to assess nNO's ability to discriminate AR from healthy people or NAR.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Ovid, Web of Science, Wanfang Data, CNKI until December 15, 2020. Differences were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI), by random-effects method.

RESULTS

A total of 10 original studies with 561 AR patients, 327 healthy controls, 123 NAR patients were included in the narrative synthesis and 9 studies in the meta-analysis. nNO in AR was significantly increased compared with healthy controls (SMD: 0.989; 95% CI: 0.402, 1.576; p = .001) or NAR (SMD: 0.680; 95% CI: 0.101, 1.259; p = 0.021). However, subgroup analysis based on measuring process and patient characteristics showed that no significant differences were detected in nNO between AR patients with nasal polyps or sinusitis or marked ostial obstruction and healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

nNO is a potential indicator for recognizing AR. Nasal polyps, sinusitis and marked ostial obstruction should be considered before nNO is applied to detect AR.

摘要

背景

变应性鼻炎(AR)、健康人群或非变应性鼻炎(NAR)患者的鼻一氧化氮(nNO)水平在先前的研究中显示出相互矛盾的结果。通过荟萃分析,我们综述了测量 AR 患者 nNO 的研究,以评估 nNO 区分 AR 与健康人群或 NAR 的能力。

方法

我们系统地检索了 PubMed、Cochrane、Embase、Ovid、Web of Science、万方数据、CNKI,检索时间截至 2020 年 12 月 15 日。差异用随机效应模型表示为标准化均数差(SMD)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

共纳入 10 项原始研究,其中 561 例 AR 患者、327 例健康对照、123 例 NAR 患者进行了叙述性综合分析,9 项研究进行了荟萃分析。与健康对照组(SMD:0.989;95%CI:0.402,1.576;p=0.001)或 NAR 患者(SMD:0.680;95%CI:0.101,1.259;p=0.021)相比,AR 患者的 nNO 显著升高。然而,基于测量过程和患者特征的亚组分析显示,在伴有鼻息肉或鼻窦炎或明显窦口阻塞的 AR 患者与健康对照组之间,nNO 无显著差异。

结论

nNO 是识别 AR 的潜在指标。在应用 nNO 检测 AR 之前,应考虑鼻息肉、鼻窦炎和明显窦口阻塞的情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验