Suppr超能文献

产前诊断孤立性先天性膈疝的胎龄和分娩方式对新生儿结局的影响。

Influence of Gestational Age and Mode of Delivery on Neonatal Outcomes in Prenatally Diagnosed Isolated Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.

机构信息

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Center for Fetal Diagnosis and Treatment, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Fetal Diagn Ther. 2021;48(5):372-380. doi: 10.1159/000515252. Epub 2021 May 5.

Abstract

AIM

The optimal gestational age (GA) at delivery and mode of delivery (MoD) for pregnancies with fetal congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is undetermined. The impact of early term (37-38 weeks 6 days) versus full term (39-40 weeks 6 days) and MoD on immediate neonatal outcomes in prenatally diagnosed isolated CDH cases was evaluated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of pregnancies evaluated and delivered with the prenatal diagnosis of CDH between July 1, 2008, and December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) length of stay (LOS), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) requirement and need for supplemental oxygen at day 30 of life.

RESULTS

A total of 296 patients were prenatally evaluated for CDH and delivered in a single center during the study period. After applying exclusion criteria, data were available on 113 women who delivered early term and 72 women who delivered full term. Survival to hospital discharge was comparable between the 2 groups - 83.2% in the early term versus 93.1% in the full term (p = 0.07; 95% CI of 0.13-1.04). No difference was observed in any other secondary outcomes. MoD was stratified into spontaneous vaginal, induced vaginal, unplanned cesarean and scheduled cesarean delivery with associated neonatal survival rates of 74.2, 90.6, 89.7 and 88.2%, respectively, p = 0.13. The 5-min Apgar score was higher in the elective cesarean group (7.94) followed by the induced vaginal delivery group (7.8) compared to 7.17 and 7.18 in the spontaneous vaginal and unplanned cesarean groups, respectively (p = 0.03). The GA and MoD did not influence survival to hospital discharge nor NICU LOS in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Though there were no significant differences in neonatal outcomes for early term compared to full term deliveries of CDH neonates, a trend toward improved survival rates and lower ECMO requirements in the full term group may suggest an underlying importance GA at delivery. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings.

摘要

目的

对于患有胎儿先天性膈疝(CDH)的孕妇,最佳分娩孕周和分娩方式尚未确定。本研究评估了早足月(37-38 周+6 天)与足月(39-40 周+6 天)分娩和分娩方式对产前诊断为孤立性 CDH 病例新生儿即刻结局的影响。

材料与方法

本研究为回顾性图表分析,纳入 2008 年 7 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间在单中心接受产前 CDH 评估并分娩的孕妇。主要结局为新生儿存活至出院。次要结局包括新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)住院时间(LOS)、体外膜氧合(ECMO)需求以及生后 30 天需补充氧气的比例。

结果

本研究共纳入 296 例接受产前 CDH 评估的孕妇,在研究期间均在单中心分娩。应用排除标准后,最终纳入 113 例早足月分娩孕妇和 72 例足月分娩孕妇。两组新生儿存活率无差异,早足月组为 83.2%,足月组为 93.1%(p=0.07;95%CI:0.13-1.04)。其他次要结局无差异。分娩方式分为自然阴道分娩、引产阴道分娩、计划剖宫产和紧急剖宫产,其新生儿存活率分别为 74.2%、90.6%、89.7%和 88.2%,差异无统计学意义(p=0.13)。选择性剖宫产组新生儿 5 分钟 Apgar 评分较高(7.94),其次是引产阴道分娩组(7.8),而自然阴道分娩组和紧急剖宫产组的 5 分钟 Apgar 评分分别为 7.17 和 7.18(p=0.03)。多因素分析显示,GA 和分娩方式均不影响新生儿存活率和 NICU LOS。

结论

虽然早足月与足月分娩的 CDH 新生儿在新生儿结局方面无显著差异,但足月分娩组的生存率和 ECMO 需求较低可能提示分娩时 GA 具有重要性。需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验