From the Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
Biostatistics.
Haematologica. 2022 Apr 1;107(4):899-908. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2021.278311.
High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplant (HDC/ASCT) is standard treatment for chemosensitive relapsed classical Hodgkin lymphoma, although outcomes of high-risk relapse (HRR) patients remain suboptimal. We retrospectively analyzed all HRR classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with HDC/ASCT at our institution between 01/01/2005 and 12/31/2019. HRR criteria included primary refractory disease/relapse within 1 year, extranodal extension, B symptoms, requiring more than one salvage line, or positron emission tomography (PET)-positive disease at ASCT. All patients met the same ASCT eligibility criteria. We treated 501 patients with BEAM (n=146), busulphan/melphalan (BuMel) (n=38), gemcitabine( Gem)/BuMel (n=189) and vorinostat/Gem/BuMel (n=128). The Gem/BuMel and vorinostat/Gem/BuMel cohorts had more HRR criteria and more patients with PET-positive disease at ASCT. Treatment with brentuximab vedotin (BV) or anti-PD1 prior to ASCT, PET-negative disease at ASCT, and maintenance BV increased over time. BEAM and BuMel predominated in earlier years (2005-2007), GemBuMel and BEAM in middle years (2008-2015), and vorinostat/GemBuMel and BEAM in later years (2016-2019). The median follow-up is 50 months (range, 6-186). Outcomes improved over time, with 2-year progressionfree survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS) rates of 58%/82% (2005-2007), 59%/83% (2008-2011), 71%/94% (2012-2015) and 86%/99% (2016- 2019) (P<0.0001). Five-year PFS/OS rates were 72%/87% after vorinostat/ GemBuMel, 55%/75% after GemBuMel, 45%/61% after BEAM, and 39%/57% after BuMel (PFS: P=0.0003; OS: P<0.0001). These differences persisted within the PET-negative and PET-positive subgroups. Prior BV and vorinostat/GemBuMel were independent predictors of more favorable outcome, whereas primary refractory disease, ≥2 salvage lines, bulky relapse, B symptoms and PET-positivity at ASCT correlated independently with unfavorable outcomes. In conclusion, post-HDC/ASCT outcomes of patients with HRR classic Hodgkin lymphoma have improved over the last 15 years. Pre-ASCT BV treatment and optimized synergistic HDC (vorinostat/GemBuMel) were associated with this improvement.
高剂量化疗和自体干细胞移植(HDC/ASCT)是化学敏感复发性经典霍奇金淋巴瘤的标准治疗方法,尽管高危复发(HRR)患者的治疗结果仍不理想。我们回顾性分析了 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间在我院接受 HDC/ASCT 治疗的所有 HRR 经典霍奇金淋巴瘤患者。HRR 标准包括原发耐药/1 年内复发、结外侵犯、B 症状、需要超过 1 线挽救治疗或 ASCT 时 PET 阳性疾病。所有患者均符合相同的 ASCT 入选标准。我们治疗了 501 例采用 BEAM(n=146)、白消安/马法兰(BuMel)(n=38)、吉西他滨(Gem)/BuMel(n=189)和伏立诺他/Gem/BuMel(n=128)治疗的 HRR 经典霍奇金淋巴瘤患者。Gem/BuMel 和伏立诺他/Gem/BuMel 队列具有更多的 HRR 标准,并且在 ASCT 时更多的患者存在 PET 阳性疾病。在 ASCT 前使用 Brentuximab vedotin(BV)或抗 PD1、ASCT 时 PET 阴性疾病和维持 BV 的治疗随着时间的推移而增加。BEAM 和 BuMel 在早期(2005-2007 年)占主导地位,GemBuMel 和 BEAM 在中期(2008-2015 年)占主导地位,而伏立诺他/GemBuMel 和 BEAM 在晚期(2016-2019 年)占主导地位。中位随访时间为 50 个月(范围,6-186)。治疗结果随着时间的推移而改善,2 年无进展生存(PFS)/总生存(OS)率分别为 58%/82%(2005-2007 年)、59%/83%(2008-2011 年)、71%/94%(2012-2015 年)和 86%/99%(2016-2019 年)(P<0.0001)。Vorinostat/GemBuMel 后 5 年 PFS/OS 率为 72%/87%,GemBuMel 后 5 年 PFS/OS 率为 55%/75%,BEAM 后 5 年 PFS/OS 率为 45%/61%,BuMel 后 5 年 PFS/OS 率为 39%/57%(PFS:P=0.0003;OS:P<0.0001)。这些差异在 PET 阴性和 PET 阳性亚组中仍然存在。在 ASCT 前接受 BV 和伏立诺他/GemBuMel 是更有利结局的独立预测因素,而原发耐药疾病、≥2 线挽救治疗、肿块复发、B 症状和 ASCT 时的 PET 阳性与不良结局独立相关。总之,过去 15 年来,HRR 经典霍奇金淋巴瘤患者接受 HDC/ASCT 后的治疗结果得到了改善。ASCT 前的 BV 治疗和优化的协同 HDC(伏立诺他/GemBuMel)与这一改善有关。