Paris Society, SPP, France.
Int J Psychoanal. 2021 Feb;102(1):139-158. doi: 10.1080/00207578.2021.1873590.
This article follows almost chronologically the COVID crisis between March and May 2020 during what is called, at least in Europe, the "first wave". Each 'Act' of our internal and external theatre is therefore a moment with a specific date, with the questions that were then pertinent. These 'Acts' were: First was the setting up of remote sessions under health pressures and the recommendations of our psychoanalytic institutions. This change in the frame and its consequences will be presented from various technical points of view, which have ostensibly raised some original metapsychological hypotheses.Then, concerning our profession, its very status as either essential or inessential has been discussed by public authorities, and inevitably by our patients, who will have to give meaning to our reactions during this crisis.We will next study the effects of remote sessions, particularly from its psychoanalytic 'economic' perspective, and as a kind of 'credit for in-presence' in the early stages of quarantine.We will then be looking at the hypothesis of a maternal element in the sessions, imperceptible in normal times, but suddenly palpable in the context of the absence of physical bodies.Finally, we will propose developments through workshops as an option in order to find a response to this unexpected event at the global scale.
这篇文章几乎按照时间顺序描述了 2020 年 3 月至 5 月期间的 COVID-19 危机,在欧洲,这段时间被称为“第一波”。因此,我们内部和外部剧场的每一个“行为”都是一个具有特定日期的时刻,以及当时相关的问题。这些“行为”是:首先,在健康压力和我们精神分析机构的建议下,远程会议被提上日程。这种框架的改变及其后果将从不同的技术角度呈现,这些角度表面上提出了一些原始的元心理学假设。然后,关于我们的职业,其作为必要或非必要的地位受到了公共当局的讨论,不可避免地也受到了我们的患者的讨论,他们将不得不为我们在这场危机中的反应赋予意义。接下来,我们将研究远程会议的效果,特别是从精神分析的“经济”角度来看,以及在隔离的早期阶段作为一种“亲临现场”的“信用”。然后,我们将研究会话中存在一种母性元素的假设,这种元素在正常情况下是不可察觉的,但在身体缺席的情况下突然变得明显。最后,我们将通过研讨会作为一种选择来提出发展,以便在全球范围内对这一意外事件做出回应。