Franco Andrew, Meldrum Jonathan, Ngaruiya Christine
Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 5;21(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06426-z.
Annually 1.5 million Americans face housing insecurity, and compared to their domiciled counterparts are three times more likely to utilize the Emergency Department (ED). Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) methods have been employed in underserved populations, but use in the ED has been limited. We employed CBPR in an urban American hospital with a primary goal of improved linkage to care, reduced ED recidivism, and improved homeless health care.
A needs analysis was performed using semi-structured individual interviews with participants experiencing homelessness as well as with stakeholders. Results were analyzed using principles of grounded theory. At the end of the interviews, respondents were invited to join the "CBPR team". At CBPR team meetings, results from interviews were expounded upon and discussions on intervention development were conducted.
Twenty-five stakeholders were interviewed including people experiencing housing insecurity, ED staff, inpatient staff, and community shelters and services. Three themes emerged from the interviews. First, the homeless population lack access to basic needs, thus management of medical needs must be managed alongside social ones. Second, specific challenges to address homeless needs in the ED include episodic care, inability to recognize housing insecurity, timely involvement of ancillary staff, and provider attitudes towards homeless patients affecting quality of care. Lastly, improved discharge planning and communication with outside resources is essential to improving homeless health and decreasing ED overutilization. A limitation of results is difficulty for participants experiencing homelessness to commit to regular CBPR meetings, as well as possible bias towards social networks influencing included stakeholders.
CBPR is a promising approach to address gaps in homeless health care as it provides a comprehensive view incorporating various critical perspectives. Key ED-based interventions addressing recidivism include improved identification of housing insecurity, reinforced relationships between ED and community resources, and better discharge planning.
每年有150万美国人面临住房不安全问题,与有住所的人相比,他们使用急诊科(ED)的可能性要高三倍。基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)方法已应用于服务不足的人群,但在急诊科的应用有限。我们在美国一家城市医院采用了CBPR方法,主要目标是改善医疗服务的联系、减少急诊科再就诊率以及改善无家可归者的医疗保健。
通过对无家可归者参与者以及利益相关者进行半结构化的个人访谈来进行需求分析。使用扎根理论原则对结果进行分析。在访谈结束时,邀请受访者加入“CBPR团队”。在CBPR团队会议上,阐述访谈结果并进行干预措施制定的讨论。
采访了25名利益相关者,包括住房不安全者、急诊科工作人员、住院部工作人员以及社区庇护所和服务机构。访谈中出现了三个主题。首先,无家可归者群体无法满足基本需求,因此医疗需求的管理必须与社会需求一并进行。其次,在急诊科满足无家可归者需求面临的具体挑战包括间歇性护理、无法识别住房不安全状况、辅助人员的及时参与以及医护人员对无家可归患者的态度影响护理质量。最后,改进出院计划以及与外部资源的沟通对于改善无家可归者的健康状况和减少急诊科过度使用至关重要。结果的一个局限性是,无家可归的参与者难以承诺定期参加CBPR会议,以及可能存在对影响所纳入利益相关者的社交网络的偏向。
CBPR是一种有前景的方法,可解决无家可归者医疗保健方面的差距,因为它提供了一个综合各种关键观点的全面视角。解决再就诊问题的基于急诊科的关键干预措施包括更好地识别住房不安全状况、加强急诊科与社区资源之间的关系以及更好的出院计划。