Public Health and Health Education, Pädagogische Hochschule Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
Public Health and Health Education, Pädagogische Hochschule Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2021 May 5;11(5):e045018. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045018.
Qualitative methods have become integral in health services research, and Andersen's behavioural model of health services use (BMHSU) is one of the most commonly employed models of health service utilisation. The model focuses on three core factors to explain healthcare utilisation: predisposing, enabling and need factors. A recent overview of the application of the BMHSU is lacking, particularly regarding its application in qualitative research. Therefore, we provide (1) a descriptive overview of the application of the BMHSU in health services research in general and (2) a qualitative synthesis on the (un)suitability of the model in qualitative health services research.
We searched five databases from March to April 2019, and in April 2020. For inclusion, each study had to focus on individuals ≥18 years of age and to cite the BMHSU, a modified version of the model, or the three core factors that constitute the model, regardless of study design, or publication type. We used MS Excel to perform descriptive statistics, and applied MAXQDA 2020 as part of a qualitative content analysis.
From a total of 6319 results, we identified 1879 publications dealing with the BMSHU. The main methodological approach was quantitative (89%). More than half of the studies are based on the BMHSU from 1995. 77 studies employed a qualitative design, the BMHSU was applied to justify the theoretical background (62%), structure the data collection (40%) and perform data coding (78%). Various publications highlight the usefulness of the BMHSU for qualitative data, while others criticise the model for several reasons (eg, its lack of cultural or psychosocial factors).
The application of different and older models of healthcare utilisation hinders comparative health services research. Future research should consider quantitative or qualitative study designs and account for the most current and comprehensive model of the BMHSU.
定性方法已成为健康服务研究不可或缺的一部分,而安德森的健康服务使用行为模型(BMHSU)是最常用的健康服务利用模型之一。该模型侧重于解释医疗保健利用的三个核心因素:倾向因素、促成因素和需求因素。最近缺乏对 BMHSU 应用的概述,特别是在定性研究方面。因此,我们提供了(1)对一般健康服务研究中 BMHSU 应用的描述性概述,以及(2)对该模型在定性健康服务研究中适用性的定性综合。
我们于 2019 年 3 月至 4 月和 2020 年 4 月在五个数据库中进行了搜索。为了纳入研究,每项研究都必须以年龄≥18 岁的个体为重点,并引用 BMHSU、该模型的修改版本或构成该模型的三个核心因素,无论研究设计或出版类型如何。我们使用 MS Excel 进行描述性统计,并用 MAXQDA 2020 作为定性内容分析的一部分。
从总共 6319 项结果中,我们确定了 1879 项涉及 BMSHU 的出版物。主要的方法学方法是定量(89%)。超过一半的研究基于 1995 年的 BMHSU。77 项研究采用了定性设计,BMHSU 被用于证明理论背景的合理性(62%)、构建数据收集(40%)和执行数据编码(78%)。各种出版物强调了 BMHSU 对定性数据的有用性,而其他出版物则出于多种原因批评该模型(例如,缺乏文化或社会心理因素)。
不同和较旧的医疗保健利用模型的应用阻碍了比较健康服务研究。未来的研究应考虑定量或定性研究设计,并考虑到 BMHSU 的最新和最全面的模型。