Vandenplas Yannick, Simoens Steven, Van Wilder Philippe, Vulto Arnold G, Huys Isabelle
Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ecole de Santé Publique, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Apr 19;12:644187. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.644187. eCollection 2021.
Best-value biological medicines may generate competition in the off-patent biologicals market, resulting in having more resources available to provide patients with access to necessary medicines while maintaining high-quality care. Belgium is a country known to have low biosimilar market shares, suggesting a malfunctioning market for off-patent biologicals. This study aims to gain an in-depth understanding of the Belgian off-patent biologicals market, by looking at the evolution in volumes and costs of the relevant products in the market. This study included a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods. The quantitative part of this study consisted of the analysis of market data obtained by the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI) for all relevant products in the Belgian off-patent biologicals market (i.e. TNF-inhibitors, insulins, granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, epoetins, rituximab, trastuzumab). In addition, for the qualitative part of this study, semi-structured interviews with Belgian stakeholders were conducted between December 2019 and March 2020. Belgian market data and stakeholder perceptions suggest a suboptimal market environment for off-patent biological and biosimilar medicines. Shifts are observed after loss of exclusivities of originator biologicals toward second-generation products or new therapeutic class products, at a higher cost and often limited added value. Moreover, cost reductions for off-patent biologicals after biosimilar market entry are mainly determined by mandatory price reductions applicable to both originator and biosimilar products, and not by lower prices induced by competition. For products used in the retail setting, significant mandatory price reductions for both originator and reference products with low biosimilar volumes were pointed out as the main reasons for the lack of price competition. For products dispensed in hospitals, the hospital financing system is important. First, it does not always encourage the use of lower cost alternatives. Second, competition mainly takes place at the level of confidential discounts in tenders. Most interviewees acknowledged the lack of a competitive environment, which is not supportive of a sustainable Belgian off-patent biologicals market. Market data and stakeholder perceptions indicate that the sustainability of the Belgian market for off-patent biologicals is challenged. A sustainable market ensures access to biological therapies now and in the future.
最具性价比的生物药物可能会在专利过期的生物制品市场引发竞争,从而带来更多资源,以便在维持高质量医疗服务的同时,让患者能够获得所需药物。比利时是一个生物类似药市场份额较低的国家,这表明其专利过期生物制品市场存在功能失调的问题。本研究旨在通过考察市场上相关产品的销量和成本变化,深入了解比利时专利过期生物制品市场。本研究采用了定量和定性研究方法相结合的方式。本研究的定量部分包括对国家健康与残疾保险研究所(NIHDI)获取的比利时专利过期生物制品市场(即肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂、胰岛素、粒细胞集落刺激因子、促红细胞生成素、利妥昔单抗、曲妥珠单抗)所有相关产品的市场数据进行分析。此外,在2019年12月至2020年3月期间,针对本研究的定性部分,对比利时的利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈。比利时的市场数据和利益相关者的看法表明,专利过期生物制品和生物类似药的市场环境并不理想。在原研生物制品专利到期后,市场出现了向第二代产品或新治疗类别产品的转变,成本更高且附加值往往有限。此外,生物类似药进入市场后,专利过期生物制品的成本降低主要取决于适用于原研产品和生物类似药产品的强制性降价,而非竞争导致的更低价格。对于零售环境中使用的产品,原研产品和生物类似药销量较低的参考产品大幅强制性降价被指出是缺乏价格竞争的主要原因。对于医院配发的产品,医院融资系统很重要。首先,它并不总是鼓励使用成本更低的替代品。其次,竞争主要发生在招标中的机密折扣层面。大多数受访者承认缺乏竞争环境,这不利于比利时专利过期生物制品市场的可持续发展。市场数据和利益相关者的看法表明,比利时专利过期生物制品市场的可持续性受到挑战。一个可持续的市场能确保现在和未来都能获得生物疗法。