Moorkens Evelien, Broux Hannah, Huys Isabelle, Vulto Arnold G, Simoens Steven
Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2020 Mar 15;8(1):1739509. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2020.1739509. eCollection 2020.
: Limited previous research and guidelines on the design of economic evaluation for biosimilars have led to unresolved methodological questions on how to assess biosimilars. : We want to raise awareness of and explore methodological issues for the economic evaluation of biosimilars. : We relied on a literature review, exploratory interviews, and our experiences. : In the majority of cases in which reimbursement for a biosimilar is sought, it will not be necessary to conduct an economic evaluation, given that the reference product is already reimbursed and standard of care. If the latter is not the case, a full economic evaluation of the biosimilar versus standard of care is needed. This might also be needed in the case of differences in administration form or adherence (for example, due to a nocebo effect) and to take into account value-added services. The entry of biosimilars and of next-generation biological products should trigger a re-assessment of the entire product class. HTA bodies and reimbursement agencies should provide clear guidance on how to assess the value of a biosimilar in each of these circumstances.
先前关于生物类似药经济评估设计的研究和指南有限,导致在如何评估生物类似药方面存在未解决的方法学问题。我们希望提高对生物类似药经济评估方法问题的认识并进行探索。我们依靠文献综述、探索性访谈以及我们的经验。在大多数寻求生物类似药报销的情况下,鉴于参比产品已获报销且为标准治疗,无需进行经济评估。如果情况并非如此,则需要对生物类似药与标准治疗进行全面的经济评估。在给药形式或依从性存在差异(例如,由于反安慰剂效应)的情况下以及考虑增值服务时,可能也需要进行经济评估。生物类似药和下一代生物制品的进入应引发对整个产品类别的重新评估。卫生技术评估机构和报销机构应就如何在每种情况下评估生物类似药的价值提供明确指导。