Blakeway Jessica-Anne, Arnould John P Y, Hoskins Andrew J, Martin-Cabrera Patricia, Sutton Grace J, Huckstadt Luis A, Costa Daniel P, Páez-Rosas Diego, Villegas-Amtmann Stella
School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia.
CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
PeerJ. 2021 Apr 13;9:e11206. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11206. eCollection 2021.
The endangered Galapagos sea lion (GSL, ) exhibits a range of foraging strategies utilising various dive types including benthic, epipelagic and mesopelagic dives. In the present study, potential prey captures (PPC), prey energy consumption and energy expenditure in lactating adult female GSLs ( = 9) were examined to determine their foraging efficiency relative to the foraging strategy used. Individuals displayed four dive types: (a) epipelagic (<100 m; EP); or (b) mesopelagic (>100 m; MP) with a characteristic V-shape or U-shape diving profile; and (c) shallow benthic (<100 m; SB) or (d) deep benthic (>100 m; DB) with square or flat-bottom dive profiles. These dive types varied in the number of PPC, assumed prey types, and the energy expended. Prey items and their energetic value were assumed from previous GSL diet studies in combination with common habitat and depth ranges of the prey. In comparison to pelagic dives occurring at similar depths, when diving benthically, GSLs had both higher prey energy consumption and foraging energy expenditure whereas PPC rate was lower. Foraging efficiency varied across dive types, with benthic dives being more profitable than pelagic dives. Three foraging trip strategies were identified and varied relative to prey energy consumed, energy expended, and dive behaviour. Foraging efficiency did not significantly vary among the foraging trip strategies suggesting that, while individuals may diverge into different foraging habitats, they are optimal within them. These findings indicate that these three strategies will have different sensitivities to habitat-specific fluctuations due to environmental change.
濒危的加拉帕戈斯海狮(GSL)展现出一系列觅食策略,利用包括底栖、上层和中层潜水等各种潜水类型。在本研究中,对9只哺乳期成年雌性GSL的潜在猎物捕获量(PPC)、猎物能量消耗和能量支出进行了研究,以确定它们相对于所采用觅食策略的觅食效率。个体表现出四种潜水类型:(a)上层潜水(<100米;EP);或(b)具有特征性V形或U形潜水剖面的中层潜水(>100米;MP);以及(c)浅底栖潜水(<100米;SB)或(d)具有方形或平底潜水剖面的深底栖潜水(>100米;DB)。这些潜水类型在PPC数量、假定的猎物类型和能量消耗方面各不相同。猎物种类及其能量值是根据先前GSL饮食研究结合猎物的常见栖息地和深度范围来假定的。与在相似深度进行的远洋潜水相比,当进行底栖潜水时,GSL的猎物能量消耗和觅食能量支出都更高,而PPC率更低。觅食效率因潜水类型而异,底栖潜水比远洋潜水更有利可图。确定了三种觅食行程策略,它们在猎物能量消耗、能量支出和潜水行为方面各不相同。觅食行程策略之间的觅食效率没有显著差异,这表明,虽然个体可能会分散到不同的觅食栖息地,但它们在各自的栖息地内是最优的。这些发现表明,由于环境变化,这三种策略对特定栖息地波动将具有不同的敏感性。