Suppr超能文献

中低收入国家医院支付方式改革效果的系统评价。

Effectiveness of hospital payment reforms in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 W Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 W Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2021 Sep 9;36(8):1344-1356. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab050.

Abstract

Payment mechanisms have attracted substantial research interest because of their consequent effect on care outcomes, including treatment costs, admission and readmission rates and patient satisfaction. Those mechanisms create the incentive environment within which health workers operate and can influence provider behaviour in ways that can facilitate achievement of national health policy goals. This systematic review aims to understand the effects of changes in hospital payment mechanisms introduced in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) on hospital- and patient-level outcomes. A standardised search of seven databases and a manual search of the grey literature and reference lists of existing reviews were performed to identify relevant articles published between January 2000 and July 2019. We included original studies focused on hospital payment reforms and their effect on hospital and patient outcomes in LMICs. Narrative descriptions or studies focusing only on provider payments or primary care settings were excluded. The authors used the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool to assess the risk of bias and quality. Results were synthesized in a narrative description due to methodological heterogeneity. A total of 24 articles from seven middle-income countries were included, the majority of which are from Asia. In most cases, hospital payment reforms included shifts from passive (fee-for-service) to active payment models-the most common being diagnosis-related group payments, capitation and global budget. In general, hospital payment reforms were associated with decreases in hospital expenditures, out-of-pocket payments, length of hospital stay and readmission rates. The majority of the articles scored low on quality due to weak study design. A shift from passive to active hospital payment methods in LMICs has been associated with lower hospital and patient costs as well as increased efficiency without any apparent compromise on quality. However, there is an important need for high-quality studies in this area.

摘要

支付机制因其对包括治疗费用、入院和再入院率以及患者满意度在内的医疗效果的影响而引起了广泛关注。这些机制创造了卫生工作者运作的激励环境,并可以通过影响提供者的行为来促进实现国家卫生政策目标。本系统评价旨在了解在中低收入国家(LMICs)引入的医院支付机制变化对医院和患者层面结果的影响。通过对七个数据库的标准搜索以及对灰色文献和现有综述参考文献的手动搜索,确定了 2000 年 1 月至 2019 年 7 月期间发表的相关文章。我们纳入了专注于医院支付改革及其对 LMICs 中医院和患者结果影响的原始研究。排除了仅关注提供者支付或初级保健环境的叙述描述或研究。作者使用干预措施非随机研究的偏倚风险工具来评估偏倚和质量风险。由于方法学的异质性,结果以叙述描述的形式进行综合。共有来自七个中等收入国家的 24 篇文章入选,其中大部分来自亚洲。在大多数情况下,医院支付改革包括从被动(按服务收费)向主动支付模式的转变,最常见的是按疾病诊断相关分组支付、人头支付和总额预算。一般来说,医院支付改革与医院支出、自付费用、住院时间和再入院率的降低有关。由于研究设计薄弱,大多数文章的质量评分较低。在 LMICs 中,从被动向主动的医院支付方式转变与降低医院和患者成本以及提高效率有关,而不会对质量造成明显影响。然而,在这一领域仍需要高质量的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验