Romanoff Anya, Olasehinde Olalekan, Goldman Debra A, Alatise Olusegun I, Constable Jeremy, Monu Ngozi, Knapp Gregory C, Odujoko Oluwole, Onabanjo Emmanuella, Adisa Adewale O, Arowolo Adeolu O, Omisore Adeleye D, Famurewa Olusola C, Anderson Benjamin O, Gemignani Mary L, Kingham T Peter
Department of Global Health and Health System Design, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Surgery, Global Cancer Disparities Initiatives, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Oncologist. 2021 Sep;26(9):e1589-e1598. doi: 10.1002/onco.13814. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an integral component of T4 breast cancer (BCa) treatment. We compared response to NAC for T4 BCa in the U.S. and Nigeria to direct future interventions.
Cross-sectional retrospective analysis included all patients with non-metastatic T4 BCa treated from 2010 to 2016 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, New York) and Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex (Ile Ife, Nigeria). Pathologic complete response (pCR) and survival were compared and factors contributing to disparities evaluated.
Three hundred and eight patients met inclusion criteria: 157 (51%) in the U.S. and 151 (49%) in Nigeria. All U.S. patients received NAC and surgery compared with 93 (62%) Nigerian patients. Fifty-six out of ninety-three (60%) Nigerian patients completed their prescribed course of NAC. In Nigeria, older age and higher socioeconomic status were associated with treatment receipt. Fewer patients in Nigeria had immunohistochemistry performed (100% U.S. vs. 18% Nigeria). Of those with available receptor subtype, 18% (28/157) of U.S. patients were triple negative versus 39% (9/23) of Nigerian patients. Overall pCR was seen in 27% (42/155) of U.S. patients and 5% (4/76) of Nigerian patients. Five-year survival was significantly shorter in Nigeria versus the U.S. (61% vs. 72%). However, among the subset of patients who received multimodality therapy, including NAC and surgery with curative intent, 5-year survival (67% vs. 72%) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (48% vs. 61%) did not significantly differ between countries.
Addressing health system, socioeconomic, and psychosocial barriers is necessary for administration of complete NAC to improve BCa outcomes in Nigeria.
This cross-sectional retrospective analysis of patients with T4 breast cancer in Nigeria and the U.S. found a significant difference in pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (5% Nigeria vs. 27% U.S.). Five-year survival was shorter in Nigeria, but in patients receiving multimodality treatment, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery with curative intent, 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival did not differ between countries. Capacity-building efforts in Nigeria should focus on access to pathology services to direct systemic therapy and promoting receipt of complete chemotherapy to improve outcomes.
新辅助化疗(NAC)是T4期乳腺癌(BCa)治疗的一个重要组成部分。我们比较了美国和尼日利亚T4期BCa患者对NAC的反应,以指导未来的干预措施。
横断面回顾性分析纳入了2010年至2016年在纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心(纽约,纽约)和奥巴费米·阿沃洛沃大学教学医院综合院区(伊费,尼日利亚)接受治疗的所有非转移性T4期BCa患者。比较了病理完全缓解(pCR)和生存率,并评估了导致差异的因素。
308例患者符合纳入标准:美国157例(51%),尼日利亚151例(49%)。所有美国患者均接受了NAC和手术,相比之下,尼日利亚有93例(62%)患者接受了治疗。93例尼日利亚患者中有56例(60%)完成了规定疗程的NAC。在尼日利亚,年龄较大和社会经济地位较高与接受治疗有关。尼日利亚进行免疫组化检测的患者较少(美国为100%,尼日利亚为18%)。在有可用受体亚型的患者中,美国18%(28/157)的患者为三阴性,而尼日利亚为39%(9/23)。美国27%(42/155)的患者实现了总体pCR, 而尼日利亚为5%(4/76)。尼日利亚的5年生存率明显低于美国(61%对72%)。然而,在接受包括NAC和根治性手术在内的多模式治疗的患者亚组中,两国的5年生存率(67%对72%)和5年无复发生存率(48%对61%)没有显著差异。
解决卫生系统、社会经济和心理社会障碍对于在尼日利亚实施完整的NAC以改善BCa治疗效果是必要的。
这项对尼日利亚和美国T4期乳腺癌患者的横断面回顾性分析发现,新辅助化疗的病理完全缓解存在显著差异(尼日利亚为5%,美国为27%)。尼日利亚的5年生存率较低,但在接受包括新辅助化疗和根治性手术在内的多模式治疗的患者中,两国的5年总生存率和无复发生存率没有差异。尼日利亚的能力建设工作应侧重于获得病理服务以指导全身治疗,并促进接受完整化疗以改善治疗效果。