Suppr超能文献

比较保险与卵巢癌、胰腺癌、肺癌、结直肠癌、前列腺癌和乳腺癌患者死亡率之间的关系。

Comparing the Association Between Insurance and Mortality in Ovarian, Pancreatic, Lung, Colorectal, Prostate, and Breast Cancers.

机构信息

Division of Urological Surgery, and.

Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Sep 1;17(9):1049-1058. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.7296.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Insurance coverage is associated with better cancer outcomes; however, the relative importance of insurance coverage may differ between cancers. This study compared the association between insurance coverage at diagnosis and cancer-specific mortality (CSM; insurance sensitivity) in 6 cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the SEER cancer registry, data were abstracted for individuals diagnosed with ovarian, pancreatic, lung, colorectal, prostate, or breast cancer in 2007 through 2010. The association between insurance coverage at diagnosis and CSM was modeled using a Fine and Gray competing-risks regression adjusted for demographics. An interaction term combining insurance status and cancer type was used to test whether insurance sensitivity differed between cancers. Separate models were fit for each cancer. To control for lead-time bias and to assess whether insurance sensitivity may be mediated by earlier diagnosis and treatment, additional models were fit adjusting for disease stage and treatment.

RESULTS

Lack of insurance was associated with an increased hazard of CSM in all cancers (P<.01). The magnitude of the effect differed significantly between cancers (Pinteraction=.04), ranging from an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.13 (95% CI, 1.01-1.28) in ovarian and 1.19 (95% CI, 1.11-1.29) in pancreatic cancer to 2.19 (95% CI, 2.02-2.37) in breast and 2.98 (95% CI, 2.54-3.49) in prostate cancer. The benefit of insurance was attenuated after adjusting for stage and treatment (eg, screening/early treatment effect), with the largest reductions in prostate, breast, and colorectal cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater insurance sensitivity was seen in screening-detected malignancies with effective treatments for early-stage disease (eg, prostate, breast, and colorectal cancers). Given that this differential is significantly reduced after adjusting for stage and treatment, our results suggest that a significant portion (but not all) of the benefit of insurance coverage is due to detection and treatment of certain curable early-stage cancers.

摘要

背景

保险覆盖与更好的癌症结果相关;然而,在不同癌症之间,保险覆盖的相对重要性可能不同。本研究比较了 6 种癌症中诊断时保险覆盖与癌症特异性死亡率(CSM;保险敏感性)之间的关联。

患者和方法

使用 SEER 癌症登记处,从 2007 年至 2010 年期间,为诊断患有卵巢癌、胰腺癌、肺癌、结直肠癌、前列腺癌或乳腺癌的个体提取数据。使用 Fine 和 Gray 竞争风险回归模型,根据人口统计学因素调整诊断时的保险覆盖与 CSM 之间的关联。使用结合保险状况和癌症类型的交互项来检验不同癌症之间的保险敏感性是否不同。为每种癌症分别拟合单独的模型。为了控制领先时间偏倚,并评估保险敏感性是否可以通过早期诊断和治疗来介导,还拟合了调整疾病分期和治疗的额外模型。

结果

缺乏保险与所有癌症的 CSM 发生风险增加相关(P<.01)。癌症之间的效应大小差异显著(P 交互=.04),范围从卵巢癌和胰腺癌的调整后危险比 1.13(95%CI,1.01-1.28)和 1.19(95%CI,1.11-1.29)到乳腺癌和前列腺癌的 2.19(95%CI,2.02-2.37)和 2.98(95%CI,2.54-3.49)。在调整分期和治疗(例如,筛查/早期治疗效果)后,保险的获益减弱,前列腺癌、乳腺癌和结直肠癌的获益减少幅度最大。

结论

在具有针对早期疾病有效治疗方法的筛查发现的恶性肿瘤中,保险敏感性更高(例如,前列腺癌、乳腺癌和结直肠癌)。由于在调整分期和治疗后这种差异显著降低,我们的结果表明,保险覆盖的部分(但不是全部)获益归因于某些可治愈的早期癌症的发现和治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验