Anterior Chamber Versus Ciliary Sulcus Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Tube Placement: Longitudinal Evaluation of Corneal Endothelial Cell Profiles.

PRCIS

An Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) tube in the ciliary sulcus (CS) is safer for the endothelium. At 4 years of follow-up, there was a significant decrease in endothelial cell count only with anterior chamber (AC) placement.

PURPOSE

Corneal endothelium (CE) damage is one of the most feared long-term complications that can result from glaucoma drainage devices. Nonetheless, there is a lack of studies evaluating longitudinal changes in CE cells. This study aims to compare CE changes after AGV implantation in eyes with AC or CS tube placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, nonrandomized, longitudinal study of pseudophakic eyes with open-angle glaucoma and medically uncontrolled intraocular pressure that received an AGV. Eyes with additional glaucoma surgeries performed during follow-up were excluded. The main outcome measure was endothelial cell density (ECD), which was evaluated 1 year±2 months and 4 years±2 months postoperatively. The average endothelial cell size (AS) and the distance from the tube tip to the cornea were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-six eyes from 26 patients, with a mean age of 73±10 years, were included. The tube was placed in the AC in 15 eyes and in the CS in 11 eyes. The eyes with tube placement in the AC showed a significant AS increase (P=0.007) and ECD decrease (P=0.034), whereas eyes with tube placement in the CS had no significant AS (P=0.575) or ECD (P=0.445) change. In the eyes with tube placement in the AC, there was no correlation between DTC and ECD (P=0.260) or AS (P=0.428) changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Tube placement in the AC seems to lead to significant CE cell loss over time, compared with tube placement in the CS.