Suppr超能文献

钬激光碎石术:15W 与 30W 钬激光碎石器,哪个更有效、更安全?

15 and 30 W Holmium:YAG Laser Lithotriptor in Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Which One Is More Effective and Safe?

机构信息

Department of Urology, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.

Department of Urology, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Jul;31(7):839-842. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0090. Epub 2021 May 5.

Abstract

Holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripsy with ureteroscopy (URS) was a safe and successful treatment option for pediatric ureteral stones. We aimed to comparatively evaluate the outcomes of 15 and 30 W Ho:YAG laser lithotriptors in pediatric ureter stones. We retrospectively evaluated 55 children who underwent ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy to treat ureter stone size up to 15 mm between September 2009 and March 2020. Groups were formed according to the laser lithotriptor power 15 W (Group 15:  = 32), 30 W (Group 30:  = 23). The efficiency of laser lithotriptors was compared between the groups. The age, gender, and stone characteristics (longest stone diameter, density, location and multiple stones) were similar between the groups. In the postop first month, stone-free status was achieved in all cases except one child in Group 15. The median operative time was significantly shorter in Group 30 (40 minutes) than in Group 15 (52.5 minutes) ( = .010). Clavien-Dindo class (CDC) 2 complications occurred in 2 children in both groups ( = .597). Although ureteric stenosis was observed in 1 patient in Group 15, no ureteric stenosis was seen in Group 30 during follow-up (median 16.1 months). Length of hospital stay (LoHS) and stone-free rates were similar between groups. URS with 15 and 30 W Ho:YAG laser lithotriptors is an effective treatment option for pediatric ureteral stones with a high success rate and low complication rates. In brief, 30 W Ho:YAG laser lithotriptors should be preferred over 15 W lithotriptors due to their shorter operative time with similar success rate.

摘要

钬激光碎石术联合输尿管镜检查(URS)是治疗小儿输尿管结石的一种安全有效的治疗选择。本研究旨在比较评估 15W 和 30W 钬激光碎石器治疗小儿输尿管结石的疗效。我们回顾性评估了 2009 年 9 月至 2020 年 3 月期间接受输尿管镜激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石大小达 15mm 的 55 例儿童。根据激光碎石器功率分为 15W 组(n=32)和 30W 组(n=23)。比较两组激光碎石器的效率。两组患儿的年龄、性别及结石特征(最长结石直径、密度、位置和多发性结石)相似。术后第一个月,除 1 例 15W 组患儿外,所有患儿均达到结石无残留状态。30W 组的中位手术时间明显短于 15W 组(40 分钟比 52.5 分钟,P=0.010)。两组均有 2 例患儿出现 Clavien-Dindo 分级(CDC)2 级并发症(P=0.597)。虽然 15W 组有 1 例患儿出现输尿管狭窄,但 30W 组在随访期间未出现输尿管狭窄(中位随访时间 16.1 个月)。两组患儿的住院时间(LoHS)和结石无残留率相似。15W 和 30W 钬激光碎石术是治疗小儿输尿管结石的有效方法,成功率高,并发症发生率低。总之,由于手术时间更短,30W 钬激光碎石器应优先于 15W 碎石器。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验