Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.
EuroIntervention. 2021 Jul 20;17(4):e343-e352. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00191.
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has a poor prognosis and limited treatment options and is frequently accompanied by right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) to reduce TR have been shown to be safe and feasible with encouraging early results. Patient selection for TTVI remains challenging, with the role of right ventricular (RV) function being unknown.
The aims of this study were 1) to investigate survival in a TTVI-treated patient population and a conservatively treated TR population, and 2) to evaluate the outcome of TTVI as compared to conservative treatment stratified according to the degree of RV function.
We studied 684 patients from the multicentre TriValve cohort (TTVI cohort) and compared them to 914 conservatively treated patients from two tertiary care centres. Propensity matching identified 213 pairs of patients with severe TR. As we observed a non-linear relationship of RV function and TTVI outcome, we stratified patients according to tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to preserved (TAPSE >17 mm), mid-range (TAPSE 13-17 mm) and reduced (TAPSE <13 mm) RV function. The primary outcome was one-year all-cause mortality.
TTVI was associated with a survival benefit in patients with severe TR when compared to matched controls (one-year mortality rate: 13.1% vs 25.8%; p=0.031). Of the three RV subgroups, only in patients with mid-range RV function was TTVI associated with an improved survival (p log-rank 0.004). In these patients, procedural success was associated with a reduced hazard ratio for all-cause mortality (HR 0.22; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.57).
TTVI is associated with reduced mortality compared to conservative therapy and might exert its highest treatment effect in patients with mid-range reduced RV function.
三尖瓣反流(TR)预后不良,治疗选择有限,常伴有右心室(RV)功能障碍。经导管三尖瓣介入治疗(TTVI)已被证明是安全可行的,并取得了令人鼓舞的早期结果。TTVI 的患者选择仍然具有挑战性,其中 RV 功能的作用尚不清楚。
本研究的目的是 1)研究 TTVI 治疗患者人群和保守治疗 TR 患者人群的生存率,以及 2)根据 RV 功能程度评估 TTVI 与保守治疗的结果。
我们研究了来自多中心 TriValve 队列(TTVI 队列)的 684 名患者,并将其与来自两个三级护理中心的 914 名保守治疗患者进行了比较。倾向匹配确定了 213 对严重 TR 患者。由于我们观察到 RV 功能与 TTVI 结果之间存在非线性关系,因此我们根据三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移(TAPSE)将患者分层为保留(TAPSE >17mm)、中范围(TAPSE 13-17mm)和降低(TAPSE <13mm)RV 功能。主要结局是一年全因死亡率。
与匹配对照组相比,TTVI 可改善严重 TR 患者的生存(一年死亡率:13.1% vs 25.8%;p=0.031)。在这三个 RV 亚组中,只有中范围 RV 功能的患者接受 TTVI 治疗后生存率提高(p log-rank 0.004)。在这些患者中,手术成功与全因死亡率的风险比降低相关(HR 0.22;95%CI:0.09,0.57)。
与保守治疗相比,TTVI 与降低死亡率相关,并且可能在中范围 RV 功能降低的患者中发挥最大的治疗效果。