• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与脓毒症快速治疗相关的临床因素。

Clinical factors associated with rapid treatment of sepsis.

机构信息

Health Management and Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States of America.

Division of Medical Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 6;16(5):e0250923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250923. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0250923
PMID:33956846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8101717/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To understand what clinical presenting features of sepsis patients are historically associated with rapid treatment involving antibiotics and fluids, as appropriate.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective, observational cohort study using a machine-learning model with an embedded feature selection mechanism (gradient boosting machine).

METHODS

For adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who were admitted through Emergency Department (ED) meeting clinical criteria of severe sepsis from 11/2007 to 05/2018 at an urban tertiary academic medical center, we developed gradient boosting models (GBMs) using a total of 760 original and derived variables, including demographic variables, laboratory values, vital signs, infection diagnosis present on admission, and historical comorbidities. We identified the most impactful factors having strong association with rapid treatment, and further applied the Shapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values to examine the marginal effects for each factor.

RESULTS

For the subgroups with or without fluid bolus treatment component, the models achieved high accuracy of area-under-receiver-operating-curve of 0.91 [95% CI, 0.86-0.95] and 0.84 [95% CI, 0.81-0.86], and sensitivity of 0.81[95% CI, 0.72-0.87] and 0.91 [95% CI, 0.81-0.97], respectively. We identified the 20 most impactful factors associated with rapid treatment for each subgroup. In the non-hypotensive subgroup, initial physiological values were the most impactful to the model, while in the fluid bolus subgroup, value minima and maxima tended to be the most impactful.

CONCLUSION

These machine learning methods identified factors associated with rapid treatment of severe sepsis patients from a large volume of high-dimensional clinical data. The results provide insight into differences in the rapid provision of treatment among patients with sepsis.

摘要

目的

了解历史上哪些脓毒症患者的临床特征与快速给予抗生素和液体等治疗有关。

设计

这是一项回顾性观察队列研究,采用具有嵌入式特征选择机制(梯度提升机)的机器学习模型。

方法

对 2007 年 11 月至 2018 年 5 月期间在城市三级学术医疗中心通过急诊(ED)就诊且符合严重脓毒症临床标准的成年患者(年龄≥18 岁),我们使用总共 760 个原始和派生变量(包括人口统计学变量、实验室值、生命体征、入院时的感染诊断和既往合并症)建立了梯度提升模型(GBM)。我们确定了与快速治疗有强关联的最具影响力的因素,并进一步应用 Shapley Additive exPlanation(SHAP)值来检查每个因素的边际效应。

结果

对于有或没有液体冲击治疗的亚组,模型的曲线下面积(AUC)的准确性高达 0.91[95%CI,0.86-0.95]和 0.84[95%CI,0.81-0.86],灵敏度为 0.81[95%CI,0.72-0.87]和 0.91[95%CI,0.81-0.97]。我们确定了每个亚组中与快速治疗相关的 20 个最具影响力的因素。在非低血压亚组中,初始生理值对模型的影响最大,而在液体冲击亚组中,值的最小值和最大值往往是最具影响力的。

结论

这些机器学习方法从大量高维临床数据中确定了与严重脓毒症患者快速治疗相关的因素。结果为脓毒症患者快速治疗的差异提供了深入了解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d23/8101717/2c03216d8657/pone.0250923.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d23/8101717/3a66800f3f35/pone.0250923.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d23/8101717/6b340ea7d0cd/pone.0250923.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d23/8101717/257539bdc7b2/pone.0250923.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d23/8101717/8ae5fd4b5261/pone.0250923.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d23/8101717/c74e19b5324c/pone.0250923.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d23/8101717/2c03216d8657/pone.0250923.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d23/8101717/3a66800f3f35/pone.0250923.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d23/8101717/6b340ea7d0cd/pone.0250923.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d23/8101717/257539bdc7b2/pone.0250923.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d23/8101717/8ae5fd4b5261/pone.0250923.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d23/8101717/c74e19b5324c/pone.0250923.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d23/8101717/2c03216d8657/pone.0250923.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical factors associated with rapid treatment of sepsis.与脓毒症快速治疗相关的临床因素。
PLoS One. 2021 May 6;16(5):e0250923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250923. eCollection 2021.
2
Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.急诊科脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测:一种基于本地大数据驱动的机器学习方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):269-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.12876. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
3
Delayed Second Dose Antibiotics for Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department With Sepsis: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes.急诊科收治的脓毒症患者延迟使用第二剂抗生素:患病率、危险因素及结局
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun;45(6):956-965. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002377.
4
Physician documentation of sepsis syndrome is associated with more aggressive treatment.医生对脓毒症综合征的记录与更积极的治疗相关。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 May;16(3):401-7. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.3.25529. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
5
Machine learning algorithms for early sepsis detection in the emergency department: A retrospective study.机器学习算法在急诊科早期脓毒症检测中的应用:一项回顾性研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Apr;160:104689. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104689. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
6
Interhospital Transfer Delays Appropriate Treatment for Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study.院内转院延迟会影响严重脓毒症和感染性休克患者的治疗:一项回顾性队列研究。
Crit Care Med. 2015 Dec;43(12):2589-96. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001301.
7
Predicting sepsis in-hospital mortality with machine learning: a multi-center study using clinical and inflammatory biomarkers.基于临床和炎症生物标志物的机器学习预测院内脓毒症死亡率:一项多中心研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Mar 6;29(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01756-0.
8
The impact of ED crowding on early interventions and mortality in patients with severe sepsis.急诊拥挤对严重脓毒症患者早期干预及死亡率的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jul;35(7):953-960. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.01.061. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
9
Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU.仅使用生命体征数据在急诊科、普通病房和重症监护病房对脓毒症预测算法进行多中心验证。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):e017833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017833.
10
Triage sepsis alert and sepsis protocol lower times to fluids and antibiotics in the ED.急诊室的脓毒症分诊警报和脓毒症治疗方案缩短了给予液体和抗生素的时间。
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;34(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.08.039. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Sepsis Management: An Overview for Clinicians.脓毒症管理中的人工智能:临床医生概述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 6;14(1):286. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010286.
2
Bundle compliance patterns in septic shock and their association with patient outcomes: an unsupervised cluster analysis.脓毒性休克中的束带依从模式及其与患者预后的关联:一项无监督聚类分析
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;20(2):489-499. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03836-9. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
3
Prospective observational pilot study of the T2Resistance panel in the T2Dx system for detection of resistance genes in bacterial bloodstream infections.

本文引用的文献

1
An Explainable Artificial Intelligence Predictor for Early Detection of Sepsis.用于脓毒症早期检测的可解释人工智能预测器。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;48(11):e1091-e1096. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004550.
2
Explainable artificial intelligence model to predict acute critical illness from electronic health records.基于电子病历预测急性危重症的可解释人工智能模型。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 31;11(1):3852. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17431-x.
3
Prediction of an Acute Hypotensive Episode During an ICU Hospitalization With a Super Learner Machine-Learning Algorithm.
T2Dx 系统中 T2Resistance 检测板用于检测细菌血流感染耐药基因的前瞻性观察性试点研究。
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Apr 10;62(4):e0129623. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01296-23. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
4
Development and Validation of an Insulin Resistance Model for a Population with Chronic Kidney Disease Using a Machine Learning Approach.基于机器学习方法的慢性肾脏病人群胰岛素抵抗模型的建立与验证。
Nutrients. 2022 Jul 9;14(14):2832. doi: 10.3390/nu14142832.
使用超级学习机机器学习算法预测 ICU 住院期间的急性低血压发作。
Anesth Analg. 2020 May;130(5):1157-1166. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004539.
4
Interventions for rapid recognition and treatment of sepsis in the emergency department: a narrative review.急诊科中脓毒症的快速识别和治疗干预措施:叙述性综述。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Feb;27(2):192-203. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.02.022. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
5
The Artificial Intelligence Clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care.人工智能临床医生学习重症监护中脓毒症的最佳治疗策略。
Nat Med. 2018 Nov;24(11):1716-1720. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0213-5. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
6
Presenting Symptoms Independently Predict Mortality in Septic Shock: Importance of a Previously Unmeasured Confounder.表现症状可独立预测感染性休克患者的死亡率:此前未测量混杂因素的重要性。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Oct;46(10):1592-1599. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003260.
7
Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU.仅使用生命体征数据在急诊科、普通病房和重症监护病房对脓毒症预测算法进行多中心验证。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):e017833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017833.
8
Delay Within the 3-Hour Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guideline on Mortality for Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.严重脓毒症和感染性休克患者的 3 小时存活脓毒症运动指南在死亡率方面的延迟。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):500-505. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002949.
9
The influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy.滤波和降采样对传递熵估计的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 17;12(11):e0188210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188210. eCollection 2017.
10
Three-Hour Bundle Compliance and Outcomes in Patients With Undiagnosed Severe Sepsis.三小时bundle 达标与不明原因严重脓毒症患者结局的相关性。
Chest. 2018 Jan;153(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.09.031. Epub 2017 Oct 5.